Objective: To assess if recording the sensory latencies of the median and ulnar nerves one-by-one (consecutive) or at the same time (simultaneous) in the ring-finger test for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) will show equivalent results or if it will lead to a different clinical classification of patients.
Methods: We assessed the limits of agreement between the simultaneous and the consecutive method based on the median- ulnar sensory latency difference derived by both methods in 80 subjects and compared the number of minimal CTS cases identified by the two methods.
Results: Limits of agreement ranged from -0.23 to 0.29 ms. A significantly higher proportion of subjects with minimal CTS (only detectable by using the comparison test) was found using the simultaneous method (n = 8 and 2, respectively; p = 0.03).
Conclusion: The two methods have a poor to moderate agreement as indicated by the range of the limits of agreement (0.5 ms).
Significance: Even small methodological changes to the ring-finger test can lead to results with different clinical meaning in the same individual and one should be aware of which method was used when interpreting results.
Keywords: CTS, carpal tunnel syndrome; EMG, electromyography; HAVS, hand arm vibration syndrome; Median-ulnar nerves comparison tests; NCS, nerve conduction study; Nerve conduction study; Ring finger test.
© 2019 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier B.V.