A Kinetic Model for Glucose Levels and Hemoglobin A1c Provides a Novel Tool for Individualized Diabetes Management
- PMID: 31910672
- PMCID: PMC8256073
- DOI: 10.1177/1932296819897613
A Kinetic Model for Glucose Levels and Hemoglobin A1c Provides a Novel Tool for Individualized Diabetes Management
Abstract
Background: Regular assessment of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) is central to the management of patients with diabetes. Estimated HbA1c (eHbA1c) from continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) has been proposed as a measure that reflects laboratory HbA1c. However, discrepancies between the two markers are common, limiting the clinical use of eHbA1c. Therefore, developing a glycemic maker that better reflects laboratory HbA1c will be highly relevant in diabetes management.
Methods: Using CGM data from two previous clinical studies in 120 individuals with diabetes, we derived a novel kinetic model that takes into account red blood cell (RBC) turnover, cross-membrane glucose transport, and hemoglobin glycation processes to individualize the relationship between glucose levels and HbA1c.
Results: Using CGM data and two laboratory HbA1c measurements, kinetic rate constants for RBC glycation and turnover were calculated. These rate constants were used to project future HbA1c, creating a new individualized glycemic marker, termed calculated HbA1c (cHbA1c). In contrast to eHbA1c, the new glycemic marker cHbA1c gave an accurate estimation of laboratory HbA1c across individuals. The model and data demonstrated a non-linear relationship between laboratory HbA1c and steady-state glucose and also showed that glycation status is modulated by age.
Conclusion: Our kinetic model offers mechanistic insights into the relationship between glucose levels and glycated hemoglobin. Therefore, the new glycemic marker does not only accurately reflect laboratory HbA1c but also provides novel concepts to explain the mechanisms for the mismatch between HbA1c and average glucose in some individuals, which has implications for future clinical management.
Keywords: HbA1c; glycemia; kinetic model; red blood cell glycation; red blood cell turnover.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
Similar articles
-
Personal Glycation Factors and Calculated Hemoglobin A1c for Diabetes Management: Real-World Data from the Diabetes Prospective Follow-up (DPV) Registry.Diabetes Technol Ther. 2021 Jun;23(6):452-459. doi: 10.1089/dia.2020.0553. Epub 2021 May 26. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2021. PMID: 33395370
-
Accurate prediction of HbA1c by continuous glucose monitoring using a kinetic model with patient-specific parameters for red blood cell lifespan and glucose uptake.Diab Vasc Dis Res. 2021 May-Jun;18(3):14791641211013734. doi: 10.1177/14791641211013734. Diab Vasc Dis Res. 2021. PMID: 33960242 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of continuous glucose monitoring-derived person-specific HbA1c in the presence and absence of complications in type 1 diabetes.Diabetes Obes Metab. 2022 Dec;24(12):2383-2390. doi: 10.1111/dom.14824. Epub 2022 Aug 11. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2022. PMID: 35876223 Free PMC article.
-
Going beyond HbA1c to understand the benefits of advanced diabetes therapies.J Diabetes. 2019 Jan;11(1):23-31. doi: 10.1111/1753-0407.12846. Epub 2018 Oct 8. J Diabetes. 2019. PMID: 30151979 Review.
-
The Glucose Management Indicator: Time to Change Course?Diabetes Care. 2024 Jun 1;47(6):906-914. doi: 10.2337/dci23-0086. Diabetes Care. 2024. PMID: 38295402 Review.
Cited by
-
Evaluating HbA1c-to-average glucose conversion with patient-specific kinetic models for diverse populations.Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 27;14(1):22098. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-72837-7. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 39333162 Free PMC article.
-
Discordance Between Glycated Hemoglobin A1c and the Glucose Management Indicator in People With Diabetes and Chronic Kidney Disease.J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2023 Nov;17(6):1553-1562. doi: 10.1177/19322968221092050. Epub 2022 Apr 25. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2023. PMID: 35466719 Free PMC article.
-
Addressing shortfalls of laboratory HbA1c using a model that incorporates red cell lifespan.Elife. 2021 Sep 13;10:e69456. doi: 10.7554/eLife.69456. Elife. 2021. PMID: 34515636 Free PMC article.
-
Diabetes Technology Meeting 2021.J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2022 Jul;16(4):1016-1056. doi: 10.1177/19322968221090279. Epub 2022 May 2. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2022. PMID: 35499170 Free PMC article.
-
Interindividual variability in average glucose-glycated haemoglobin relationship in type 1 diabetes and implications for clinical practice.Diabetes Obes Metab. 2022 Sep;24(9):1779-1787. doi: 10.1111/dom.14763. Epub 2022 Jun 2. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2022. PMID: 35546274 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Holman RR, Paul SK, Bethel MA, Matthews DR, Neil HA. 10-year follow-up of intensive glucose control in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(15):1577-1589. - PubMed
-
- UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). Lancet. 1998;352(9131):837-853. - PubMed
-
- The Diabetes Control and Complications (DCCT) Research Group. Effect of intensive therapy on the development and progression of diabetic nephropathy in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial. Kidney Int. 1995;47(6):1703-1720. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
