Tool to Aid Patients in Selecting a Liver Transplant Center
- PMID: 31923342
- PMCID: PMC8193801
- DOI: 10.1002/lt.25715
Tool to Aid Patients in Selecting a Liver Transplant Center
Abstract
Variations in candidate and donor acceptance criteria may influence access and mortality for liver transplantation. We sought to understand how recipient and donor characteristics vary across centers and how patients interpret this information, and we used these data to develop a tool to provide tailored information to candidates seeking a center (www.transplantcentersearch.org). We analyzed liver recipient data from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients to determine how recipient and donor characteristics (eg, age, Medicaid use, and human immunodeficiency virus status) varied across programs. Data included recipients and donors at each US program between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2017. The variation in characteristics was plotted with centers stratified by total transplant volume and by volume of each characteristic. A subset of characteristics was plotted to show variation over 3 years. We created mockups of potential reports displaying recipient characteristics alongside pretransplant and posttransplant outcomes and solicited feedback at patient and family interviews and focus groups, which included 39 individuals: 10 pilot interviews with candidates seeking liver transplant at the University of Minnesota-Fairview (UMNF) and 5 focus groups with 13 UMNF candidates, 6 UMNF family members, and 10 national recipients. Transcripts were analyzed using a thematic analysis. Several themes emerged: (1) Candidates experience gaps in existing education about center options; (2) patients requested information about how selection criteria might impact access to transplant; and (3) information tailored to a candidate's medical characteristics can inform decisions. Characteristics shown on mockups varied across centers (P < 0.01). Variation was widespread for small and large centers. In conclusion, variation exists in recipient and donor characteristics across centers. Liver transplant patients provide positive feedback upon viewing patient-specific search tools.
Copyright © 2019 by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.
Conflict of interest statement
Potential conflict of interest: Nothing to report.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Designing a patient-specific search of transplant program performance and outcomes: Feedback from heart transplant candidates and recipients.Clin Transplant. 2021 Feb;35(2):e14183. doi: 10.1111/ctr.14183. Epub 2020 Dec 19. Clin Transplant. 2021. PMID: 33617066 Free PMC article.
-
Development of a Patient-specific Search of Transplant Program Outcomes and Characteristics: Feedback From Kidney Transplant Patients.Transplant Direct. 2020 Jul 17;6(8):e585. doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000001036. eCollection 2020 Aug. Transplant Direct. 2020. PMID: 32766433 Free PMC article.
-
Liver transplantation in the United States: a report from the UNOS Liver Transplant Registry.Clin Transpl. 1999:23-34. Clin Transpl. 1999. PMID: 11038623
-
Transplant Programs: An Overview of the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients.Nephrol Nurs J. 2022 Nov-Dec;46(6):505-508. Nephrol Nurs J. 2022. PMID: 36645359 Review.
-
Liver and Kidney Recipient Selection of Hepatitis C Virus Viremic Donors: Meeting Consensus Report From the 2019 Controversies in Transplantation.Transplantation. 2020 Mar;104(3):476-481. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000003014. Transplantation. 2020. PMID: 31634329 Review.
Cited by
-
Integrated transcriptomics and histopathology approach identifies a subset of rejected donor livers with potential suitability for transplantation.BMC Genomics. 2024 May 2;25(1):437. doi: 10.1186/s12864-024-10362-7. BMC Genomics. 2024. PMID: 38698335 Free PMC article.
-
Design of a patient-centered decision support tool when selecting an organ transplant center.PLoS One. 2021 May 17;16(5):e0251102. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251102. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 33999964 Free PMC article.
-
Designing a patient-specific search of transplant program performance and outcomes: Feedback from heart transplant candidates and recipients.Clin Transplant. 2021 Feb;35(2):e14183. doi: 10.1111/ctr.14183. Epub 2020 Dec 19. Clin Transplant. 2021. PMID: 33617066 Free PMC article.
-
Internet Published Policies Regarding Liver Transplant Eligibility and Substance Use in United States Transplant Centers.Hepatol Commun. 2020 Sep 7;4(11):1717-1724. doi: 10.1002/hep4.1591. eCollection 2020 Nov. Hepatol Commun. 2020. PMID: 33163840 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Martin P, DiMartini A, Feng S, Brown R, Fallon M. Evaluation for liver transplantation in adults: 2013 practice guideline by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the American Society of Transplantation. Hepatology 2014;59:1144–1165. - PubMed
-
- Fayek SA, Quintini C, Chavin KD, Marsh CL. The current state of liver transplantation in the United States: Perspective from American Society of Transplant Surgeons (ASTS) Scientific Studies Committee and endorsed by ASTS Council. Am J Transplant 2016;16:3093–3104. - PubMed
-
- Secunda K, Gordon EJ, Sohn MW, Shinkunas LA, Kaldjian LC, Voigt MD, Levitsky J. National survey of provider opinions on controversial characteristics of liver transplant candidates. Liver Transpl 2013;19:395–403. - PubMed
-
- Hasanin M, Dubay DA, McGuire BM, Schiano T, Singal AK. Liver transplantation for alcoholic hepatitis: a survey of liver transplant centers. Liver Transpl 2015;21:1449–1452. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
