Complications of peripheral venous catheters: The need to propose an alternative route of administration

Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2020 Mar;55(3):105875. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.105875. Epub 2020 Jan 8.

Abstract

Use of peripheral venous catheters (PVCs) is very common in hospitals. According to the literature, after a visit to the emergency department >75% of hospitalised patients carry a PVC, among which almost 50% are useless. In this study, the presence and complications of PVCs in an infectious diseases (ID) unit of a French tertiary-care university hospital were monitored. A total of 614 patients were prospectively included over a 6-month period. Among the 614 patients, 509 (82.9%) arrived in the ID unit with a PVC, of which 260 (51.1%) were judged unnecessary and were removed as soon as the patients were examined by the ID team. More than one-half of PVCs were removed within 24 h in the unit (308/509; 60.5%). PVCs were complicated for 65 (12.8%) of the 509 patients, with complications including extravasation, cutaneous necrosis, lymphangitis, phlebitis, tearing off the patient, superficial venous thrombosis and arthritis. We must therefore continue to search for unjustified PVC insertion. Alternatives to the intravenous administration route must be proposed, such as subcutaneous infusion or oral antibiotic therapy.

Keywords: Bloodstream infection; Peripheral venous catheter; Phlebitis.

MeSH terms

  • Catheter-Related Infections / etiology
  • Catheterization, Peripheral / adverse effects*
  • Drug Administration Routes
  • Emergency Service, Hospital
  • Humans
  • Phlebitis / etiology