Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Jan 14;10(1):132.
doi: 10.3390/ani10010132.

Innovations in Camera Trapping Technology and Approaches: The Integration of Citizen Science and Artificial Intelligence

Affiliations
Free PMC article
Review

Innovations in Camera Trapping Technology and Approaches: The Integration of Citizen Science and Artificial Intelligence

Siân E Green et al. Animals (Basel). .
Free PMC article

Abstract

Camera trapping has become an increasingly reliable and mainstream tool for surveying a diversity of wildlife species. Concurrent with this has been an increasing effort to involve the wider public in the research process, in an approach known as 'citizen science'. To date, millions of people have contributed to research across a wide variety of disciplines as a result. Although their value for public engagement was recognised early on, camera traps were initially ill-suited for citizen science. As camera trap technology has evolved, cameras have become more user-friendly and the enormous quantities of data they now collect has led researchers to seek assistance in classifying footage. This has now made camera trap research a prime candidate for citizen science, as reflected by the large number of camera trap projects now integrating public participation. Researchers are also turning to Artificial Intelligence (AI) to assist with classification of footage. Although this rapidly-advancing field is already proving a useful tool, accuracy is variable and AI does not provide the social and engagement benefits associated with citizen science approaches. We propose, as a solution, more efforts to combine citizen science with AI to improve classification accuracy and efficiency while maintaining public involvement.

Keywords: artificial intelligence; camera trapping; camera traps; citizen science; conservation technology; data processing; engagement; public awareness.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Wearn O.R., Glover-Kapfer P. Snap happy: Camera traps are an effective sampling tool when compared with alternative methods. R. Soc. Open Sci. 2019;6:181748. doi: 10.1098/rsos.181748. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Meek P.D., Ballard G.A., Vernes K., Fleming P.J.S. The history of wildlife camera trapping as a survey tool in Australia. Aust. Mammal. 2015;37:1–12. doi: 10.1071/AM14021. - DOI
    1. Glover-Kapfer P., Soto-Navarro C.A., Wearn O.R. Camera-trapping version 3.0: Current constraints and future priorities for development. Remote Sens. Ecol. Conserv. 2019:1–15. doi: 10.1002/rse2.106. - DOI
    1. Tabak M.A., Norouzzadeh M.S., Wolfson D.W., Sweeney S.J., Vercauteren K.C., Snow N.P., Halseth J.M., Di Salvo P.A., Lewis J.S., White M.D., et al. Machine learning to classify animal species in camera trap images: Applications in ecology. Methods Ecol. Evol. 2019;10:585–590. doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.13120. - DOI
    1. Norouzzadeh M.S., Nguyen A., Kosmala M., Swanson A., Palmer M., Packer C., Clune J. Automatically identifying, counting, and describing wild animals in camera-trap images with deep learning. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2018;115:E5716–E5725. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1719367115. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Grant support

Feedback