Long-term re-procedure rate after mid-urethral slings for stress urinary incontinence

Int Urogynecol J. 2020 Apr;31(4):727-735. doi: 10.1007/s00192-019-04223-1. Epub 2020 Jan 20.

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis: Long-term safety concerns have risen over the mid-urethral sling operation (MUS) for stress urinary incontinence (SUI), which in some countries has led to litigations and even suspending MUS insertions. We examined the long-term re-procedure rate after MUS operations. The main outcome was re-procedures for SUI. The secondary outcome was surgical interventions due to complications.

Methods: We analysed a retrospective population cohort of 3531 women with MUS operations in 2000-2006 and followed them up until 31 December 2016. Data were collected from a national hospital register and from hospital patient records.

Results: The median follow-up time was 13 years (IQR 11.6-14.8) for the 3280 women with a retropubic MUS (RP-MUS) and 11 years (IQR 10.3-11.9) for the 245 women with a transobturator MUS (TO-MUS). The cumulative number of re-procedures for SUI was 16 (0.5%) at 1 year, 66 (1.9%) at 5 years, 97 (2.8%) at 10 years and 112 (3.2%) at 17 years. This risk was higher after TO-MUS than after RP-MUS operations (OR 3.6, 95% CI 2.5-5.2, p < 0.001). The cumulative number of any long-term re-procedure was 43 (1.2%) at year 1, 105 (3.0%) at year 5, 144 (4.1%) at year 10 and 163 (4.6%) at year 17.

Conclusions: Re-procedures occur up to 17 years after primary MUS insertion, but their incidence is low after the first few postoperative years. Re-procedures for recurrent SUI are more common after TO-MUS than RP-MUS.

Keywords: Mesh tape; Mid-urethral sling; Stress urinary incontinence; TOT; TVT.

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Middle Aged
  • Reoperation
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Suburethral Slings* / adverse effects
  • Urinary Incontinence, Stress* / surgery
  • Urologic Surgical Procedures