The effect of knee resizing illusions on pain and swelling in symptomatic knee osteoarthritis: a case report

Erin MacIntyre; Maja Sigerseth; Brian W Pulling; Roger Newport; Tasha R Stanton

doi:10.1097/PR9.0000000000000795

The effect of knee resizing illusions on pain and swelling in symptomatic knee osteoarthritis: a case report

Pain Rep. 2019 Nov 21;4(6):e795. doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000000795. eCollection 2019 Nov-Dec.

Authors

Erin MacIntyre¹, Maja Sigerseth^{2

3}, Brian W Pulling³, Roger Newport⁴, Tasha R Stanton^{3

5}

Affiliations

¹ Sports and Spinal Physiotherapy, Sunshine Coast, Queensland, Australia.
² Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, Member of Physiotherapy Research Group, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
³ IIMPACT in Health, The University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
⁴ School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, United Kingdom.
⁵ Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Abstract

Introduction: Resizing illusions that manipulate perceived body size are analgesic in some chronic pain conditions. Little is known whether such illusions may also alter other physiological features, such as swelling.

Objectives: To determine the effects of a knee resizing illusion on knee pain and swelling in symptomatic osteoarthritis.

Methods: This case study was extracted from a larger study evaluating the analgesic effects of resizing illusions in people with knee osteoarthritis. A mediated reality system (alters real-time video) was used to provide resizing "stretch" and "shrink" illusions of the knee. Knee pain intensity (0-100 numerical rating scale) was measured before and after illusion and after sustained (3 minutes) and repeated (n = 10) illusions. In this case study, knee swelling (leg circumference below, at, and above the knee) was also measured.

Results: The 55-year-old male participant reported a long history of episodic knee pain and swelling that was subsequently diagnosed as severe osteoarthritis in 2013. In the first testing session, the participant experienced an increase in pain with the shrink illusion and a decrease in pain with stretch illusion. A noticeable increase in knee swelling was also observed. Thus, in sessions 2/3, swelling was also assessed. The stretch illusion decreased pain to the largest extent, but resulted in increased knee swelling. Repeated and sustained stretch illusions had cumulative analgesic effects but resulted in cumulative increases in swelling. While the shrink illusion increased pain, sustained (∼10 minutes) visual minification of the entire knee and leg reduced both pain and swelling.

Conclusion: Our case report suggests that both pain and swelling may be modifiable by altering body-relevant sensory input in symptomatic knee osteoarthritis.

Keywords: Body illusion; Mediated reality; Mental representation; Osteoarthritis; Pain; Swelling.

Publication types

Case Reports