Rationale and design of CH STRONG: Congenital Heart Survey To Recognize Outcomes, Needs, and well-beinG
- PMID: 31986287
- PMCID: PMC9141095
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2019.12.021
Rationale and design of CH STRONG: Congenital Heart Survey To Recognize Outcomes, Needs, and well-beinG
Abstract
Studies of outcomes among adults with congenital heart defects (CHDs) have focused on those receiving cardiac care, limiting generalizability. The Congenital Heart Survey To Recognize Outcomes, Needs, and well-beinG (CH STRONG) will assess comorbidities, health care utilization, quality of life, and social and educational outcomes from a US population-based sample of young adults living with CHD.
Methods: Individuals with CHD born between 1980 and 1997 were identified using active, population-based birth defects surveillance systems from 3 US locations (Arkansas [AR]; Arizona [AZ]; and Atlanta, Georgia [GA]) linked to death records. Individuals with current contact information responded to mailed survey materials during 2016 to 2019. Respondents and nonrespondents were compared using χ2 tests.
Results: Sites obtained contact information for 74.6% of the 9,312 eligible individuals alive at recruitment. Of those, 1,656 returned surveys, either online (18.1%) or via paper (81.9%), for a response rate of 23.9% (AR: 18.3%; AZ: 30.7%; Atlanta, GA: 28.0%; P value < .01). For 20.0% of respondents, a proxy completed the survey, with 63.9% reporting that the individual with CHD was mentally unable. Among respondents and nonrespondents, respectively, sex (female: 54.0% and 47.3%), maternal race/ethnicity (non-Hispanic white: 74.3% and 63.0%), CHD severity (severe: 33.8% and 27.9%), and noncardiac congenital anomalies (34.8% and 38.9%) differed significantly (P value < .01); birth year (1991-1997: 56.0% and 57.5%) and presence of Down syndrome (9.2% and 8.9%) did not differ.
Conclusions: CH STRONG will provide the first multisite, population-based findings on long-term outcomes among the growing population of US adults with CHD.
Published by Elsevier Inc.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations of interest: none.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Neighborhood social deprivation and healthcare utilization, disability, and comorbidities among young adults with congenital heart defects: Congenital heart survey to recognize outcomes, needs, and well-being 2016-2019.Birth Defects Res. 2023 Oct 15;115(17):1608-1618. doi: 10.1002/bdr2.2239. Epub 2023 Aug 14. Birth Defects Res. 2023. PMID: 37578352 Free PMC article.
-
Comorbidities Among Young Adults with Congenital Heart Defects: Results from the Congenital Heart Survey To Recognize Outcomes, Needs, and well-beinG - Arizona, Arkansas, and Metropolitan Atlanta, 2016-2019.MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021 Feb 12;70(6):197-201. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7006a3. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021. PMID: 33571179 Free PMC article.
-
Advance Care Directives Among a Population-Based Sample of Young Adults with Congenital Heart Defects, CH STRONG, 2016-2019.Pediatr Cardiol. 2021 Dec;42(8):1775-1784. doi: 10.1007/s00246-021-02663-5. Epub 2021 Jun 23. Pediatr Cardiol. 2021. PMID: 34164699 Free PMC article.
-
Cardiac Rehabilitation for Adults With Congenital Heart Disease: Physical and Psychosocial Considerations.Can J Cardiol. 2018 Oct;34(10 Suppl 2):S270-S277. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2018.07.016. Epub 2018 Jul 23. Can J Cardiol. 2018. PMID: 30274637 Review.
-
The emerging psychosocial profile of the adult congenital heart disease patient.Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2020 Oct;25(5):506-512. doi: 10.1097/MOT.0000000000000802. Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2020. PMID: 32833706 Review.
Cited by
-
Patient-Reported Outcomes Among Adults With Congenital Heart Disease in the Congenital Heart Initiative Registry.JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Oct 1;7(10):e2439629. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.39629. JAMA Netw Open. 2024. PMID: 39412804 Free PMC article.
-
Neighborhood social deprivation and healthcare utilization, disability, and comorbidities among young adults with congenital heart defects: Congenital heart survey to recognize outcomes, needs, and well-being 2016-2019.Birth Defects Res. 2023 Oct 15;115(17):1608-1618. doi: 10.1002/bdr2.2239. Epub 2023 Aug 14. Birth Defects Res. 2023. PMID: 37578352 Free PMC article.
-
Survival From Birth Until Young Adulthood Among Individuals With Congenital Heart Defects: CH STRONG.Circulation. 2023 Aug 15;148(7):575-588. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.123.064400. Epub 2023 Jul 4. Circulation. 2023. PMID: 37401461 Free PMC article.
-
Healthcare and Socioeconomic Outcomes Among Young Adults With Congenital Heart Defects and Functional Cognitive Disabilities, CH STRONG 2016 to 2019.Am J Cardiol. 2023 Aug 15;201:229-231. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.05.074. Epub 2023 Jun 28. Am J Cardiol. 2023. PMID: 37390699 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Reproductive Health Counseling and Concerns Among Women with Congenital Heart Defects With and Without Disabilities.J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2023 Jul;32(7):740-746. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2022.0395. Epub 2023 May 12. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2023. PMID: 37184635 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Bellinger DC, Wypij D, duPlessis AJ, et al. Neurodevelopmental status at eight years in children with dextro-transposition of the great arteries: the Boston Circulatory Arrest Trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003;126(5):1385–96. - PubMed
-
- Kogon B, Grudziak J, Sahu A, et al. Surgery in adults with congenital heart disease: risk factors for morbidity and mortality. Ann Thorac Surg 2013;95(4):1377–82 discussion 1382. - PubMed
-
- Mahle WT, Clancy RR, Moss EM, et al. Neurodevelopmental outcome and lifestyle assessment in school-aged and adolescent children with hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Pediatrics 2000;105(5):1082–9. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials

