Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Feb 18;172(4):248-257.
doi: 10.7326/M19-1980. Epub 2020 Jan 28.

Cost-Effectiveness of Transitional Care Services After Hospitalization With Heart Failure

Affiliations

Cost-Effectiveness of Transitional Care Services After Hospitalization With Heart Failure

Manuel R Blum et al. Ann Intern Med. .

Abstract

Background: Patients with heart failure (HF) discharged from the hospital are at high risk for death and rehospitalization. Transitional care service interventions attempt to mitigate these risks.

Objective: To assess the cost-effectiveness of 3 types of postdischarge HF transitional care services and standard care.

Design: Decision analytic microsimulation model.

Data sources: Randomized controlled trials, clinical registries, cohort studies, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention life tables, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services data, and National Inpatient Sample (Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project) data.

Target population: Patients with HF who were aged 75 years at hospital discharge.

Time horizon: Lifetime.

Perspective: Health care sector.

Intervention: Disease management clinics, nurse home visits (NHVs), and nurse case management.

Outcome measures: Quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), costs, net monetary benefits, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs).

Results of base-case analysis: All 3 transitional care interventions examined were more costly and effective than standard care, with NHVs dominating the other 2 interventions. Compared with standard care, NHVs increased QALYs (2.49 vs. 2.25) and costs ($81 327 vs. $76 705), resulting in an ICER of $19 570 per QALY gained.

Results of sensitivity analysis: Results were largely insensitive to variations in in-hospital mortality, age at baseline, or costs of rehospitalization. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis confirmed that transitional care services were preferred over standard care in nearly all 10 000 samples, at willingness-to-pay thresholds of $50 000 or more per QALY gained.

Limitation: Transitional care service designs and implementations are heterogeneous, leading to uncertainty about intervention effectiveness and costs when applied in particular settings.

Conclusion: In older patients with HF, transitional care services are economically attractive, with NHVs being the most cost-effective strategy in many situations. Transitional care services should become the standard of care for postdischarge management of patients with HF.

Primary funding source: Swiss National Science Foundation, Research Council of Norway, and an Intermountain-Stanford collaboration.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types