Response properties of cochlear efferent neurons: monaural vs. binaural stimulation and the effects of noise
- PMID: 3199181
- DOI: 10.1152/jn.1988.60.5.1779
Response properties of cochlear efferent neurons: monaural vs. binaural stimulation and the effects of noise
Abstract
1. Discharge properties of olivocochlear efferent neurons were measured in anesthetized cats. Previous studies of these neurons concentrated on monaural stimulation with tones and found sound-evoked discharge rates rarely exceeded 60 spikes/s (16, 20). In the present study, rates as high as 140 spikes/s were achieved by binaural stimulation and/or the addition of noise. Based on studies on the known effects of electrically stimulating the efferents such high rates of sound-evoked efferent activity probably have significant feedback effects on the auditory periphery. 2. Spontaneous discharge rate (SR) was weakly correlated with threshold among efferent neurons: those with SRs greater than 1 spikes/s were generally more sensitive than spontaneously inactive fibers. The discharge rate measured in the absence of acoustic stimulation was shown to be dependent on stimulation history: some units with zero SR became spontaneously active after several minutes of continuous noise stimulation. 3. For stimulation with monaural tones, efferent excitability varied with characteristic frequency (CF): units with CF less than 10 kHz tended to have lower thresholds, higher discharge rates, and shorter latencies than higher CF units. These differences could be minimized by the addition of broadband noise (see below). 4. When tones were presented to one ear at a time, most efferent units appeared monaural (91%), with roughly two-thirds excited by ipsilateral stimuli and one-third by contralateral stimuli. However, the effects of simultaneous stimulation of the two ears suggested that the great majority of efferent units have binaural inputs: the addition of opposite-ear noise or tones, which presented alone were not excitatory, typically enhanced the response to main-ear stimulation. This type of binaural facilitation was strongest among low-CF efferents when the opposite-ear stimuli were tones, and strongest among high-CF units when the opposite-ear stimulus was broadband noise. 5. The binaural facilitation seen using opposite-ear noise both lowered the threshold (by as much as 40 dB) and increased the discharge rate (by as much as 80%) to tones presented in the main ear. Significant facilitation was seen with noise levels as low as 25 dB SPL or tone levels as low as 30 dB SPL. In general, the weaker the response to monaural stimuli, the stronger the binaural facilitation. 6. The facilitatory effects of stimulation with continuous noise could outlast the stimulus. Persistent increases in efferent sensitivity were documented following 10-min exposures to broadband noise at 85-115 dB SPL.
Similar articles
-
Single olivocochlear neurons in the guinea pig. I. Binaural facilitation of responses to high-level noise.J Neurophysiol. 1998 Jun;79(6):3077-87. doi: 10.1152/jn.1998.79.6.3077. J Neurophysiol. 1998. PMID: 9636109
-
Single olivocochlear neurons in the guinea pig. II. Response plasticity due to noise conditioning.J Neurophysiol. 1998 Jun;79(6):3088-97. doi: 10.1152/jn.1998.79.6.3088. J Neurophysiol. 1998. PMID: 9636110
-
Physiology and anatomy of single olivocochlear neurons in the cat.Hear Res. 1986;24(1):17-36. doi: 10.1016/0378-5955(86)90003-1. Hear Res. 1986. PMID: 3759672
-
Protection from acoustic trauma is not a primary function of the medial olivocochlear efferent system.J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2003 Dec;4(4):445-65. doi: 10.1007/s10162-002-3013-y. Epub 2003 Jun 6. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2003. PMID: 12784134 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Absence of both auditory evoked potentials and auditory percepts dependent on timing cues.Brain. 1991 Jun;114 ( Pt 3):1157-80. doi: 10.1093/brain/114.3.1157. Brain. 1991. PMID: 2065245 Review.
Cited by
-
Protection from noise-induced hearing loss by Kv2.2 potassium currents in the central medial olivocochlear system.J Neurosci. 2013 May 22;33(21):9113-21. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5043-12.2013. J Neurosci. 2013. PMID: 23699522 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of human auditory efferent feedback on cochlear gain and compression.J Neurosci. 2014 Nov 12;34(46):15319-26. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1043-14.2014. J Neurosci. 2014. PMID: 25392499 Free PMC article.
-
Contralateral-noise effects on cochlear responses in anesthetized mice are dominated by feedback from an unknown pathway.J Neurophysiol. 2012 Jul;108(2):491-500. doi: 10.1152/jn.01050.2011. Epub 2012 Apr 18. J Neurophysiol. 2012. PMID: 22514298 Free PMC article.
-
Mice lacking adrenergic signaling have normal cochlear responses and normal resistance to acoustic injury but enhanced susceptibility to middle-ear infection.J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2010 Sep;11(3):449-61. doi: 10.1007/s10162-010-0220-9. Epub 2010 May 26. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2010. PMID: 20503062 Free PMC article.
-
Modulation of hair cell efferents.Hear Res. 2011 Sep;279(1-2):1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2010.12.018. Epub 2010 Dec 25. Hear Res. 2011. PMID: 21187136 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
