Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial

Five-Year Outcomes of Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic-Valve Replacement

Raj R Makkar et al. N Engl J Med. .

Abstract

Background: There are scant data on long-term clinical outcomes and bioprosthetic-valve function after transcatheter aortic-valve replacement (TAVR) as compared with surgical aortic-valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis and intermediate surgical risk.

Methods: We enrolled 2032 intermediate-risk patients with severe, symptomatic aortic stenosis at 57 centers. Patients were stratified according to intended transfemoral or transthoracic access (76.3% and 23.7%, respectively) and were randomly assigned to undergo either TAVR or surgical replacement. Clinical, echocardiographic, and health-status outcomes were followed for 5 years. The primary end point was death from any cause or disabling stroke.

Results: At 5 years, there was no significant difference in the incidence of death from any cause or disabling stroke between the TAVR group and the surgery group (47.9% and 43.4%, respectively; hazard ratio, 1.09; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.95 to 1.25; P = 0.21). Results were similar for the transfemoral-access cohort (44.5% and 42.0%, respectively; hazard ratio, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.87 to 1.20), but the incidence of death or disabling stroke was higher after TAVR than after surgery in the transthoracic-access cohort (59.3% vs. 48.3%; hazard ratio, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.71). At 5 years, more patients in the TAVR group than in the surgery group had at least mild paravalvular aortic regurgitation (33.3% vs. 6.3%). Repeat hospitalizations were more frequent after TAVR than after surgery (33.3% vs. 25.2%), as were aortic-valve reinterventions (3.2% vs. 0.8%). Improvement in health status at 5 years was similar for TAVR and surgery.

Conclusions: Among patients with aortic stenosis who were at intermediate surgical risk, there was no significant difference in the incidence of death or disabling stroke at 5 years after TAVR as compared with surgical aortic-valve replacement. (Funded by Edwards Lifesciences; PARTNER 2 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01314313.).

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Similar articles

  • Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic-Valve Replacement in Intermediate-Risk Patients.
    Leon MB, Smith CR, Mack MJ, Makkar RR, Svensson LG, Kodali SK, Thourani VH, Tuzcu EM, Miller DC, Herrmann HC, Doshi D, Cohen DJ, Pichard AD, Kapadia S, Dewey T, Babaliaros V, Szeto WY, Williams MR, Kereiakes D, Zajarias A, Greason KL, Whisenant BK, Hodson RW, Moses JW, Trento A, Brown DL, Fearon WF, Pibarot P, Hahn RT, Jaber WA, Anderson WN, Alu MC, Webb JG; PARTNER 2 Investigators. Leon MB, et al. N Engl J Med. 2016 Apr 28;374(17):1609-20. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1514616. Epub 2016 Apr 2. N Engl J Med. 2016. PMID: 27040324 Clinical Trial.
  • Two-year outcomes after transcatheter or surgical aortic-valve replacement.
    Kodali SK, Williams MR, Smith CR, Svensson LG, Webb JG, Makkar RR, Fontana GP, Dewey TM, Thourani VH, Pichard AD, Fischbein M, Szeto WY, Lim S, Greason KL, Teirstein PS, Malaisrie SC, Douglas PS, Hahn RT, Whisenant B, Zajarias A, Wang D, Akin JJ, Anderson WN, Leon MB; PARTNER Trial Investigators. Kodali SK, et al. N Engl J Med. 2012 May 3;366(18):1686-95. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1200384. Epub 2012 Mar 26. N Engl J Med. 2012. PMID: 22443479 Clinical Trial.
  • Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement with a Balloon-Expandable Valve in Low-Risk Patients.
    Mack MJ, Leon MB, Thourani VH, Makkar R, Kodali SK, Russo M, Kapadia SR, Malaisrie SC, Cohen DJ, Pibarot P, Leipsic J, Hahn RT, Blanke P, Williams MR, McCabe JM, Brown DL, Babaliaros V, Goldman S, Szeto WY, Genereux P, Pershad A, Pocock SJ, Alu MC, Webb JG, Smith CR; PARTNER 3 Investigators. Mack MJ, et al. N Engl J Med. 2019 May 2;380(18):1695-1705. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1814052. Epub 2019 Mar 16. N Engl J Med. 2019. PMID: 30883058 Clinical Trial.
  • Transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus surgery for symptomatic severe aortic stenosis: A reconstructed individual patient data meta-analysis.
    Dowling C, Kondapally Seshasai SR, Firoozi S, Brecker SJ. Dowling C, et al. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Jul;96(1):158-166. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28504. Epub 2019 Sep 30. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020. PMID: 31566902 Review.
  • Meta-analysis of transfemoral TAVR versus surgical aortic valve replacement.
    Arora S, Vaidya SR, Strassle PD, Misenheimer JA, Rhodes JA, Ramm CJ, Wheeler EN, Caranasos TG, Cavender MA, Vavalle JP. Arora S, et al. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Mar 1;91(4):806-812. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27357. Epub 2017 Oct 25. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018. PMID: 29068166 Review.

Cited by

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources