Study design: Retrospective cohort study.
Objective: To investigate radiological differences in lumbar disc herniations (herniated nucleus pulposus [HNP]) between patients receiving microscopic lumbar discectomy (MLD) and nonoperative patients.
Methods: Patients with primary treatment for an HNP at a single academic institution between November 2012 to March 2017 were divided into MLD and nonoperative treatment groups. Using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), axial HNP area; axial canal area; HNP canal compromise; HNP cephalad/caudal migration and HNP MRI signal (black, gray, or mixed) were measured. T test and chi-square analyses compared differences in the groups, binary logistic regression analysis determined odds ratios (ORs), and decision tree analysis compared the cutoff values for risk factors.
Results: A total of 285 patients (78 MLD, 207 nonoperative) were included. Risk factors for MLD treatment included larger axial HNP area (P < .01, OR = 1.01), caudal migration, and migration magnitude (P < .05, OR = 1.90; P < .01, OR = 1.14), and gray HNP MRI signal (P < .01, OR = 5.42). Cutoff values for risks included axial HNP area (70.52 mm2, OR = 2.66, P < .01), HNP canal compromise (20.0%, OR = 3.29, P < .01), and cephalad/caudal migration (6.8 mm, OR = 2.43, P < .01). MLD risk for those with gray HNP MRI signal (67.6% alone) increased when combined with axial HNP area >70.52 mm2 (75.5%, P = .01) and HNP canal compromise >20.0% (71.1%, P = .05) cutoffs. MLD risk in patients with cephalad/caudal migration >6.8 mm (40.5% alone) increased when combined with axial HNP area and HNP canal compromise (52.4%, 50%; P < .01).
Conclusion: Patients who underwent MLD treatment had significantly different axial HNP area, frequency of caudal migration, magnitude of cephalad/caudal migration, and disc herniation MRI signal compared to patients with nonoperative treatment.
Keywords: MRI; herniated nucleus pulposus; lumbar spine; microscopic lumbar discectomy; surgery.
© The Author(s) 2019.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Preoperative MRI predictors of health-related quality of life improvement after microscopic lumbar discectomy.Spine J. 2020 Mar;20(3):391-398. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2019.09.020. Epub 2019 Sep 30. Spine J. 2020. PMID: 31580903
Percent spinal canal compromise on MRI utilized for predicting the need for surgical treatment in single-level lumbar intervertebral disc herniation.Spine J. 2005 Nov-Dec;5(6):608-14. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2005.05.384. Spine J. 2005. PMID: 16291099
Correlation of end plate shape on MRI and disc degeneration in surgically treated patients with degenerative disc disease and herniated nucleus pulposus.Spine J. 2007 Jan-Feb;7(1):32-8. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2006.02.029. Spine J. 2007. PMID: 17197330
Obesity increases the risk of recurrent herniated nucleus pulposus after lumbar microdiscectomy.Spine J. 2010 Jul;10(7):575-80. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2010.02.021. Epub 2010 Mar 27. Spine J. 2010. PMID: 20347400
The acute lumbar disc herniation: imaging diagnosis.Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 1993 Dec;14(6):389-98. doi: 10.1016/s0887-2171(05)80032-0. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 1993. PMID: 8297631 Review.
- Fardon DF, Williams AL, Dohring EJ, Murtagh FR, Rothman SLG, Sze GK. Lumbar disc nomenclature: version 2.0: recommendations of the combined task forces of the North American Spine Society, the American Society of Spine Radiology, and the American Society of Neuroradiology. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014;39:E1448–E1465. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182a8866d - PubMed
- Herzog RJ, Guyer RD, Graham-Smith A, Simmons ED., Jr Magnetic resonance imaging. Use in patients with low back or radicular pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1995;20:1834–1838. - PubMed