Self-Ordering Laboratory Testing: Limitations When a Physician Is not Part of the Model

Clin Lab Med. 2020 Mar;40(1):37-49. doi: 10.1016/j.cll.2019.11.002. Epub 2020 Jan 7.

Abstract

This review discusses considerations related to laboratory diagnostic testing purchased directly by consumers without the care and oversight of a medical doctor. There are necessary tensions between the patient, physician, laboratory medical professional (physician or scientist), laboratory as a corporate entity (where applicable), and manufacturers of diagnostic equipment. When the physician, in particular, the primary care physician, is removed from this relationship, there is a significant opportunity of exploitation of the patient. All downstream investigations following direct-to-consumer testing, including attendant risk, are offloaded onto the traditional medical system, caring physician(s), and patients themselves. This process places patients at risk of iatrogenic harm.

Keywords: CLIA-waived; Direct-to-consumer testing; FDA; Genetics; Genomics; Point of care; US Food and Drug Administration.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Direct-To-Consumer Screening and Testing / standards*
  • Genetic Testing / standards
  • Genomics / standards
  • Humans
  • United States
  • United States Food and Drug Administration