Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Filters applied. Clear all
, 9, 48-63

It Takes a Community to Conceive: An Analysis of the Scope, Nature and Accuracy of Online Sources of Health Information for Couples Trying to Conceive


It Takes a Community to Conceive: An Analysis of the Scope, Nature and Accuracy of Online Sources of Health Information for Couples Trying to Conceive

Sophie G E Kedzior et al. Reprod Biomed Soc Online.


This study examined the nature and accuracy of information available across online platforms for couples trying to conceive. A consumer simulation-based investigation of English websites and social media (Facebook, Twitter, Instagram) was undertaken using common search terms identified in a pilot study. Claims about fertility and pregnancy health were then extracted from the results and analysed thematically. The accuracy of each claim was assessed independently by six fertility and conception experts, rated on a scale of 1 (not factual) to 4 (highly factual), with scores collated to produce a median rating. Claims with a median score < 3 were classified as inaccurate. The use of the terms 'trying to conceive' and '#TTC' were common identifiers on online platforms. Claims were extracted predominantly from websites (n = 89) rather than social media, with Twitter and Instagram comprising commercial elements and Facebook focused on community-based support. Thematic analysis revealed three major themes among the claims across all platforms: conception behaviour and monitoring, lifestyle and exposures, and medical. Fact-checking by the experts revealed that 40% of the information assessed was inaccurate, and that inaccuracies were more likely to be present in the conception behaviour and monitoring advice, the topics most amenable to modification. Since online information is a readily accessible and commonly utilized resource, there is opportunity for improved dissemination of evidence-based material to reach interested couples. Further cross-disciplinary and consumer-based research, such as a user survey, is required to understand how best to provide the 'trying to conceive' community with accurate information.

Keywords: accuracy; conception; fertility; internet; social media.


Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Fact-checking rating of claims displayed as topics. Data are presented as median (minimum–maximum). Different categories had varying amounts of claims. Self-monitoring: cervical mucus, basal body temperature (BBT). Products: assisted conception. Copulation behaviour: timing, frequency, gamete survival, ejaculation, timing to conceive, other sex claims. Modifiable: weight, exercise, unhealthy habits, healthy habits, sleep and sunlight, other, medications, chemical exposure. Unmodifiable: age. Screening: preconception check-up, timing to seek help, reasons to seek help. Other: prevalence of infertility, conditions that impact fertility. AS, assisted conception. Factual rating scale score: 1 = not factual, 2 = somewhat factual, 3 = quite factual, 4 = highly factual.

Similar articles

See all similar articles


    1. AlGhamdi K.M., Moussa N.A. Internet use by the public to search for health-related information. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2012;81(6):363–373. - PubMed
    1. Alotaibi N.M. The Use of Social Media Communications in Brain Aneurysms and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Mixed-Method Analysis. World Neurosurgery. 2017;98:456–462. - PubMed
    1. Antheunis M.L. ‘Patients’ and health professionals’ use of social media in health care: Motives, barriers and expectations. Patient Educ. Couns. 2013;92(3):426–431. - PubMed
    1. Balbo N. Fertility in Advanced Societies: A Review of Research. European Journal of Population / Revue européenne de Démographie. 2013;29(1):1–38. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bartlett Y.K., Coulson N.S. An investigation into the empowerment effects of using online support groups and how this affects health professional/patient communication. Patient Educ. Couns. 2011;83(1):113–119. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources