Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
, 20 (1), 101

Coffee Drinking and Cancer Risk: An Umbrella Review of Meta-Analyses of Observational Studies

Affiliations

Coffee Drinking and Cancer Risk: An Umbrella Review of Meta-Analyses of Observational Studies

Long-Gang Zhao et al. BMC Cancer.

Abstract

Background: Epidemiological studies on the association between coffee intake and cancer risk have yielded inconsistent results. To summarize and appraise the quality of the current evidence, we conducted an umbrella review of existing findings from meta-analyses of observational studies.

Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane database to obtain systematic reviews and meta-analyses of associations between coffee intake and cancer incidence. For each association, we estimated the summary effect size using the fixed- and random-effects model, the 95% confidence interval, and the 95% prediction interval. We also assessed heterogeneity, evidence of small-study effects, and excess significance bias.

Results: Twenty-eight individual meta-analyses including 36 summary associations for 26 cancer sites were retrieved for this umbrella review. A total of 17 meta-analyses were significant at P ≤ 0.05 in the random-effects model. For the highest versus lowest categories, 4 of 26 associations had a more stringent P value (P ≤ 10- 6). Associations for five cancers were significant in dose-response analyses. Most studies (69%) showed low heterogeneity (I2 ≤ 50%). Three and six associations had evidence of excessive significance bias and publication bias, respectively. Coffee intake was inversely related to the risk of liver cancer and endometrial cancer and was characterized by dose-response relationships. There were no substantial changes when we restricted analyses to meta-analysis of cohort studies.

Conclusions: There is highly suggestive evidence for an inverse association between coffee intake and risk of liver and endometrial cancer. Further research is needed to provide more robust evidence for cancer at other sites.

Keywords: Cancer; Coffee; Grading evidence; Observational studies; Umbrella review.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow diagram of the selection process of meta-analyses on coffee intake and cancers
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Summary estimates with 95% confidence and prediction intervals from 36 associations of coffee and cancer. H/L, the highest versus lowest intake of coffee; RR, relative risk; PI, prediction intervals. RRs and 95%CIs displayed were calculated from random-effects models.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Cano-Marquina A, Tarin JJ, Cano A. The impact of coffee on health. Maturitas. 2013;75(1):7–21. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2013.02.002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Park SY, Freedman ND, Haiman CA, Le Marchand L, Wilkens LR, Setiawan VW. Prospective study of coffee consumption and cancer incidence in non-white populations. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2018;27(8):928–935. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-18-0093. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Weinstein ND. Reactions to life-style warnings: coffee and cancer. Health Educ Q. 1985;12(2):129–134. doi: 10.1177/109019818501200201. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bohn SK, Blomhoff R, Paur I. Coffee and cancer risk, epidemiological evidence, and molecular mechanisms. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2014;58(5):915–930. doi: 10.1002/mnfr.201300526. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gaascht F, Dicato M, Diederich M. Coffee provides a natural multitarget pharmacopeia against the hallmarks of cancer. Genes Nutr. 2015;10(6):51. doi: 10.1007/s12263-015-0501-3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources

Feedback