The efficacy of bone-anchored hearing implant surgery in children: A systematic review
- PMID: 32028192
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2020.109906
The efficacy of bone-anchored hearing implant surgery in children: A systematic review
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of Bone-Anchored Hearing implants (BAHIs) in children and to elucidate the usage and outcomes of new surgical techniques and implants in this specific population.
Data sources: Embase and PubMed.
Study selection: We identified studies evaluating surgical outcomes of BAHIs in children. Retrieved articles were screened using predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Critical appraisal included directness of evidence and risk of bias. Studies that successfully passed critical appraisal were included.
Data extraction: Outcome measures included patient demographics, follow-up time, surgical technique (one-versus two-stage surgery), tissue handling technique (reduction versus preservation), type of implant used, and complications.
Data synthesis: We selected 20 articles published between 2000 and 2017 for data extraction, encompassing 952 implanted BAHIs. The overall mean age at implantation was 8.6 years (range, 2-21 years). Adverse soft-tissue reactions occurred in 251 of the 952 implants (26.4%; range 0%-89% across studies). Revision surgery was performed in 16.8% (142 of the 845) of the implants. The total rate of implant loss, i.e. caused by OIF (n = 61), trauma (n = 33), recurrent infection (n = 15), elective removal due to insufficient benefit (n = 1), cosmetic reasons (n = 1), or unknown reason (n = 16), was 13.3% of the implants (127 out of 952; range 0%-40% across studies). Differences are seen in the type of implants used; wide-diameter implants seem to be superior in terms of implant survival, and similar in terms of adverse skin reactions, while one-stage surgery and soft-tissue preservation do not seem to result in higher implant loss rates or increased adverse skin reactions based upon limited amounts of literature.
Conclusion: In general, BAHIs are a safe method for hearing rehabilitation in children, although large differences between studies are observed. The outcomes of new surgical techniques and implant designs in the pediatric population seem promising, but more research is needed before definitive conclusions can be drawn.
Keywords: Baha; Bone-anchored hearing; Children; Hearing loss; Holgers; ISQ; Implant loss; Implant stability; Soft tissue reactions; Wide-diameter implant.
Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of competing interest The authors report financial support to the authors’ institution (Radboudumc) for conducting clinical studies from Oticon Medical AB (Askim, Sweden) and from Cochlear Bone Anchored Solutions AB (Mölnlycke, Sweden) outside the submitted work. The authors declare that they have no other conflict of interest.
Similar articles
-
Wide diameter bone-anchored hearing system implants: a comparison of long-term follow-up data between tissue reduction and tissue preservation techniques.Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 Feb;276(2):349-356. doi: 10.1007/s00405-018-5228-5. Epub 2018 Dec 7. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019. PMID: 30535539
-
Multimodal Analysis of the Tissue Response to a Bone-Anchored Hearing Implant: Presentation of a Two-Year Case Report of a Patient With Recurrent Pain, Inflammation, and Infection, Including a Systematic Literature Review.Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021 Mar 30;11:640899. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.640899. eCollection 2021. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021. PMID: 33859952 Free PMC article.
-
Percutaneous bone-anchored hearing implant surgery: inside or outside the line of incision?Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016 Nov;273(11):3713-3722. doi: 10.1007/s00405-016-4020-7. Epub 2016 Apr 16. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016. PMID: 27086360 Free PMC article.
-
A Systematic Review on Complications of Tissue Preservation Surgical Techniques in Percutaneous Bone Conduction Hearing Devices.Otol Neurotol. 2016 Aug;37(7):829-37. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001091. Otol Neurotol. 2016. PMID: 27273402 Review.
-
Punch vs open surgical techniques for placement of bone-anchored hearing implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis of skin reactions and operating time.Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2021 Sep;278(9):3171-3180. doi: 10.1007/s00405-020-06511-9. Epub 2021 Jan 2. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2021. PMID: 33389004 Review.
Cited by
-
An objective bone conduction verification tool using a piezoelectric thin-film force transducer.Front Neurosci. 2022 Nov 17;16:1068682. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.1068682. eCollection 2022. Front Neurosci. 2022. PMID: 36466173 Free PMC article.
-
Assessment Protocol for Candidates for Bone-Anchored Hearing Devices.Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2022 Jun 14;26(4):e718-e724. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1745734. eCollection 2022 Oct. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2022. PMID: 36405456 Free PMC article.
-
The Bonebridge BCI 602 Active Transcutaneous Bone Conduction Implant in Children: Objective and Subjective Benefits.J Clin Med. 2021 Dec 16;10(24):5916. doi: 10.3390/jcm10245916. J Clin Med. 2021. PMID: 34945210 Free PMC article.
-
Molecular Response to Nanopatterned Implants in the Human Jaw Bone.ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2021 Dec 13;7(12):5878-5889. doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.1c00861. Epub 2021 Dec 1. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2021. PMID: 34851620 Free PMC article.
-
Cartilage Conduction Hearing and Its Clinical Application.Audiol Res. 2021 Jun 3;11(2):254-262. doi: 10.3390/audiolres11020023. Audiol Res. 2021. PMID: 34204875 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
