Purpose: This study aimed to compare the effects of four resistance training (RT) programs with different velocity loss (VL) thresholds: 0% (VL0), 10% (VL10), 20% (VL20) and 40% (VL40) on sprint and jump performance, muscle strength, neuromuscular, muscle hypertrophy and architectural adaptations.
Methods: Sixty-four young resistance-trained men were randomly assigned into four groups (VL0, VL10, VL20, and VL40) that differed in the VL allowed in each set. Subjects followed an RT program for 8 weeks (2 sessions per week) using the full-squat (SQ) exercise, with similar relative intensity (70-85% 1RM), number of sets (3) and inter-set recovery period (4-min). Before and after the RT program the following tests were performed: 1) muscle hypertrophy and architecture of the vastus lateralis (VLA); 2) tensiomyography; 3) 20-m running sprint; 4) vertical jump; 5) maximal voluntary isometric contraction in SQ; 6) progressive loading test in SQ; and 7) fatigue test.
Results: No between-group differences existed for RT-induced gains in sprint, jump and strength performance despite the differences in the total volume performed by each group. VL20 and VL40 showed significant increases (P < 0.001) in muscle hypertrophy (group × time interaction, P = 0.06). However, only VL40 exhibited a significant slowing (P < 0.001) of the delay time in the VLA muscle (group × time interaction: P = 0.05). Moreover, VL40 showed a significant decrease in the early rate of force development (P = 0.04).
Conclusions: Higher VL thresholds (i.e. VL20 and VL40) maximized hypertrophic adaptations, although an excessive VL during the set (i.e. VL40) may also induce negative neuromuscular adaptations. Therefore, moderate VL thresholds should be chosen to maximize strength adaptations and to prevent negative neuromuscular adaptations.
Effects of velocity loss during resistance training on athletic performance, strength gains and muscle adaptations.Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2017 Jul;27(7):724-735. doi: 10.1111/sms.12678. Epub 2016 Mar 31. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2017. PMID: 27038416 Clinical Trial.
Velocity-based resistance training: Impact of velocity loss in the set on neuromuscular performance and hormonal response.Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2020 Feb 4. doi: 10.1139/apnm-2019-0829. Online ahead of print. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2020. PMID: 32017598
Low-Velocity Loss Induces Similar Strength Gains to Moderate-Velocity Loss During Resistance Training.J Strength Cond Res. 2020 Jan 3. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003487. Online ahead of print. J Strength Cond Res. 2020. PMID: 31904715
Short-term Periodization Models: Effects on Strength and Speed-strength Performance.Sports Med. 2015 Oct;45(10):1373-86. doi: 10.1007/s40279-015-0355-2. Sports Med. 2015. PMID: 26133514 Review.
Effects of different resistance training volumes on strength and power in team sport athletes.J Strength Cond Res. 2013 Jul;27(7):1832-40. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3182736d10. J Strength Cond Res. 2013. PMID: 23044934 Review.