Introduction: Prior literature shows that neonates with cystic fibrosis (CF) are more likely to be born low birth weight (LBW, <2500 grams) and/or small for gestational age (SGA, <10th percentile for weight) than non-CF counterparts. There is limited literature exploring the predictive effects of birth parameters on long-term outcomes.
Methods: The study population (CF Twin and Sibling Study) was recruited between 2000-2013 (n = 1677). Relationships between FEV1 percent predicted at 6, 12, or 18 years or BMI z-score at 2, 6, 12, or 18 years, and predictor variables (LBW or SGA status) were assessed using adjusted linear regressions.
Results: Mean birth weight was 3.3 ± 0.7 kg (Females: 3.2 ± 0.7kg; males: 3.4 ± 0.7kg) and mean gestational age was 38.4 ± 2.6 weeks, with 10.2% of participants classified as SGA. Predictors of LBW included female sex, pancreatic insufficiency, and prematurity. Predictors of SGA included female sex. After adjustment, LBW was associated with lower BMI at ages 2-12 years and SGA was associated with lower BMI at age 2 years. LBW was associated with lower FEV1 percent predicted only at age 6 years. SGA was not associated with FEV1.
Conclusions: We did not observe higher rates of LBW or SGA in full term infants compared to the general population. We observed associations particularly between LBW and BMI or FEV1, but these associations decreased with age, suggesting that alternate factors contribute to outcomes over time. In lieu of the ability to target growth during gestation, efforts could be considered to optimize infant nutritional status, which may improve later life outcomes.
Keywords: BMI; Cystic fibrosis; FEV1; birth weight; gestational age; neonate.
Copyright © 2020 European Cystic Fibrosis Society. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of Competing Interest No conflicts of interest exist.
Growth of very low birth weight infants to age 20 years.Pediatrics. 2003 Jul;112(1 Pt 1):e30-8. doi: 10.1542/peds.112.1.e30. Pediatrics. 2003. PMID: 12837903
Routine ultrasound at 32 vs 36 weeks' gestation: prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Jun;53(6):761-768. doi: 10.1002/uog.20258. Epub 2019 Apr 30. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019. PMID: 30883981
Maternal plasma lipid levels across pregnancy and the risks of small-for-gestational age and low birth weight: a cohort study from rural Gambia.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Mar 12;20(1):153. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-2834-1. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020. PMID: 32164563 Free PMC article.
New Option in the Lives Saved Tool (LiST) Allows for the Conversion of Prevalence of Small-for-Gestational-Age and Preterm Births to Prevalence of Low Birth Weight.J Nutr. 2017 Nov;147(11):2141S-2146S. doi: 10.3945/jn.117.247767. Epub 2017 Sep 13. J Nutr. 2017. PMID: 28904115 Review.
Small for gestational age, term babies, in the first six years of life.Eur J Clin Nutr. 1998 Jan;52 Suppl 1:S59-64. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1998. PMID: 9511021 Review.