Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Mar 4;8(9):1781-1800.
doi: 10.1039/c9tb02710f.

Substituted hydroxyapatite coatings of bone implants

Affiliations
Review

Substituted hydroxyapatite coatings of bone implants

Daniel Arcos et al. J Mater Chem B. .

Abstract

Surface modification of orthopedic and dental implants has been demonstrated to be an effective strategy to accelerate bone healing at early implantation times. Among the different alternatives, coating implants with a layer of hydroxyapatite (HAp) is one of the most used techniques, due to its excellent biocompatibility and osteoconductive behavior. The composition and crystalline structure of HAp allow for numerous ionic substitutions that provide added value, such as antibiotic properties or osteoinduction. In this article, we will review and critically analyze the most important advances in the field of substituted hydroxyapatite coatings. In recent years substituted HAp coatings have been deposited not only on orthopedic prostheses and dental implants, but also on macroporous scaffolds, thus expanding their applications towards bone regeneration therapies. Besides, the capability of substituted HAps to immobilize proteins and growth factors by non-covalent interactions has opened new possibilities for preparing hybrid coatings that foster bone healing processes. Finally, the most important in vivo outcomes will be discussed to understand the prospects of substituted HAp coatings from a clinical point of view.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The unit cell of hydroxyapatite projected along the a axis (left) and along the c axis (right) showing Ca1, Ca2, tetrahedral phosphates and hydroxyl sites. Ionic substitutions with potential therapeutic effects are indicated (bottom).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Implantation of a macroporous Ti6Al4V scaffold coated with Si-HAp/VEGF in an osteoporotic sheep model (a). Computed tomography scan image of the implant within the bone defect (b). Histological overview of bones implanted with uncoated Ti6Al4V microporous implants (c) and SiHAp/VEGF coated implants (d).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Crawford RW, Murray DW. Ann Rheum Dis. 1997;56:455. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pye AD, Lockhart DEA, Dawson MP, Murray CA, Smith AJ. J Hosp Infect. 2009;72:104. - PubMed
    1. Tomsia AP, Launey ME, Lee JS, Mankani MH, Wegst UGK, Saiz E. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011;26:25. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Christenson EM, Anseth KS, van der Beucken LJJP, Chan CK, Ercn B, Jansen JA, et al. J Orthop Res. 2007;25:11. - PubMed
    1. Arcos D, Boccaccini AR, Bohner M, Díez-Pérez A, Epple M, Gómez-Barrena E, Herrera A, Planell JA, Rodríguez-Mañas L, Vallet-Regí M. Acta Biomater. 2014;10:1793. - PubMed

Publication types