Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Feb 2;5(1):2381468320904364.
doi: 10.1177/2381468320904364. eCollection 2020 Jan-Jun.

Factors Associated With Hospital Decisions to Purchase Robotic Surgical Systems

Affiliations

Factors Associated With Hospital Decisions to Purchase Robotic Surgical Systems

Chan Shen et al. MDM Policy Pract. .

Abstract

Background. Robotic surgical systems are expensive to own and operate, and the purchase of such technology is an important decision for hospital administrators. Most prior literature focuses on the comparison of clinical outcomes between robotic surgery and other laparoscopic or open surgery. There is a knowledge gap about what drives hospitals' decisions to purchase robotic systems. Objective. To identify factors associated with a hospital's acquisition of advanced surgical systems. Method. We used 2002 to 2011 data from the State of California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development to examine robotic surgical system purchase decisions of 476 hospitals. We used a probit estimation allowing heteroscedasticity in the error term including a set of two equations: one binary response equation and one heteroscedasticity equation. Results. During the study timeframe, there were 78 robotic surgical systems purchased by hospitals in the sample. Controlling for hospital characteristics such as number of available beds, teaching status, nonprofit status, and patient mix, the probit estimation showed that market-level directly relevant surgery volume in the previous year (excluding the hospital's own volume) had the largest impact. More specifically, hospitals in high volume (>50,000 surgeries v. 0) markets were 12 percentage points more likely to purchase robotic systems. We also found that hospitals in less competitive markets (i.e., Herfindahl index above 2500) were 2 percentage points more likely to purchase robotic systems. Limitations. This study has limitations common to observational database studies. Certain characteristics such as cultural factors cannot be accurately quantified. Conclusions. Our findings imply that potential market demand is a strong driver for hospital purchase of robotic surgical systems. Market competition does not significantly increase the adoption of new expensive surgical technologies.

Keywords: health care market; hospital administration; robotic surgical system.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. National health expenditure projections 2018–2027 [cited May 9, 2019]. Available at: https://www.cms.gov/Research-Statistics-Data-and-Systems/Statistics-Tren....
    1. Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. Snapshots: how changes in medical technology affect health care costs [cited March 10, 2019]. Available at: https://www.kff.org/health-costs/issue-brief/snapshots-how-changes-in-me....
    1. Bodenheimer T. High and rising health care costs. Part 2: technologic innovation. Ann Intern Med. 2005;142:932–7. - PubMed
    1. Cutler DM, McClellan M. Is technological change in medicine worth it? Health Aff (Millwood). 2001;20:11–29. - PubMed
    1. Barbash GI, Glied SA. New technology and health care costs—the case of robot-assisted surgery. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:701–4. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources