How do Spanish speakers read words? Insights from a crowdsourced lexical decision megastudy
- PMID: 32072567
- DOI: 10.3758/s13428-020-01357-9
How do Spanish speakers read words? Insights from a crowdsourced lexical decision megastudy
Abstract
Vocabulary size seems to be affected by multiple factors, including those that belong to the properties of the words themselves and those that relate to the characteristics of the individuals assessing the words. In this study, we present results from a crowdsourced lexical decision megastudy in which more than 150,000 native speakers from around 20 Spanish-speaking countries performed a lexical decision task to 70 target word items selected from a list of about 45,000 Spanish words. We examined how demographic characteristics such as age, education level, and multilingualism affected participants' vocabulary size. Also, we explored how common factors related to words like frequency, length, and orthographic neighbourhood influenced the knowledge of a particular item. Results indicated important contributions of age to overall vocabulary size, with vocabulary size increasing in a logarithmic fashion with this factor. Furthermore, a contrast between monolingual and bilingual communities within Spain revealed no significant vocabulary size differences between the communities. Additionally, we replicated the standard effects of the words' properties and their interactions, accurately accounting for the estimated knowledge of a particular word. These results highlight the value of crowdsourced approaches to uncover effects that are traditionally masked by small-sampled in-lab factorial experimental designs.
Keywords: Ageing; Crowdsourcing megastudy; Spanish lexical decision; Vocabulary size.
Similar articles
-
Prevalence norms for 40,777 Catalan words: An online megastudy of vocabulary size.Behav Res Methods. 2023 Sep;55(6):3198-3217. doi: 10.3758/s13428-022-01959-5. Epub 2022 Sep 9. Behav Res Methods. 2023. PMID: 36085541 Free PMC article.
-
Word knowledge in the crowd: Measuring vocabulary size and word prevalence in a massive online experiment.Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2015;68(8):1665-92. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2015.1022560. Epub 2015 Apr 8. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2015. PMID: 25715025
-
Recognition times for 62 thousand English words: Data from the English Crowdsourcing Project.Behav Res Methods. 2020 Apr;52(2):741-760. doi: 10.3758/s13428-019-01272-8. Behav Res Methods. 2020. PMID: 31368025
-
How do bilinguals identify the language of the words they read?Brain Res. 2015 Oct 22;1624:153-166. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2015.07.035. Epub 2015 Jul 30. Brain Res. 2015. PMID: 26236021
-
Modeling reading vocabulary learning in deaf children in bilingual education programs.J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2008 Spring;13(2):155-74. doi: 10.1093/deafed/enm057. Epub 2007 Nov 28. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2008. PMID: 18048369 Review.
Cited by
-
Proficiency versus lexical processing efficiency as a measure of L2 lexical quality: Individual differences in word-frequency effects in L2 visual word recognition.Mem Cognit. 2023 Nov;51(8):1858-1869. doi: 10.3758/s13421-023-01436-0. Epub 2023 Sep 14. Mem Cognit. 2023. PMID: 37707723
-
Prevalence norms for 40,777 Catalan words: An online megastudy of vocabulary size.Behav Res Methods. 2023 Sep;55(6):3198-3217. doi: 10.3758/s13428-022-01959-5. Epub 2022 Sep 9. Behav Res Methods. 2023. PMID: 36085541 Free PMC article.
-
Does online masked priming pass the test? The effects of prime exposure duration on masked identity priming.Behav Res Methods. 2023 Jan;55(1):151-167. doi: 10.3758/s13428-021-01742-y. Epub 2022 Mar 16. Behav Res Methods. 2023. PMID: 35297017 Free PMC article.
-
SpaVerb-WN-A megastudy of naming times for 4562 Spanish verbs: Effects of psycholinguistic and motor content variables.Behav Res Methods. 2022 Dec;54(6):2640-2664. doi: 10.3758/s13428-021-01734-y. Epub 2021 Dec 16. Behav Res Methods. 2022. PMID: 34918230 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of Print Exposure on an Online Lexical Decision Task: A Direct Replication Using a Web-Based Experimental Procedure.Front Psychol. 2021 Aug 11;12:710663. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.710663. eCollection 2021. Front Psychol. 2021. PMID: 34456825 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Acha, J., & Perea, M. (2008). The effects of length and transposed-letter similarity in lexical decision: Evidence with beginning, intermediate, and adult readers. British Journal of Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1348/000712607X224478
-
- Aguasvivas, J. A., Carreiras, M., Brysbaert, M., Mandera, P., Keuleers, E., & Duñabeitia, J. A. (2018). SPALEX: A Spanish Lexical decision database from a Massive Online Data Collection. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02156
-
- Andrews, S. (1997). The effect of orthographic similarity on lexical retrieal: Resolving neighbourhood conflicts. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review2, 4(4), 439–461. - DOI
-
- Balota, D. A., Cortese, M. J., Sergent-Marshall, S. D., Spieler, D. H., & Yap, M. J. (2004). Visual word recognition of single-syllable words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.133.2.283
-
- Balota, D. A., Yap, M. J., & Cortese, M. J. (2006). Visual Word Recognition: The Journey From Features to Meaning (A Travel Update). In Handbook of Psycholinguistics. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012369374-7/50010-9
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous
