Bacterial coexistence driven by motility and spatial competition
- PMID: 32076271
- DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-2033-2
Bacterial coexistence driven by motility and spatial competition
Abstract
Elucidating elementary mechanisms that underlie bacterial diversity is central to ecology1,2 and microbiome research3. Bacteria are known to coexist by metabolic specialization4, cooperation5 and cyclic warfare6-8. Many species are also motile9, which is studied in terms of mechanism10,11, benefit12,13, strategy14,15, evolution16,17 and ecology18,19. Indeed, bacteria often compete for nutrient patches that become available periodically or by random disturbances2,20,21. However, the role of bacterial motility in coexistence remains unexplored experimentally. Here we show that-for mixed bacterial populations that colonize nutrient patches-either population outcompetes the other when low in relative abundance. This inversion of the competitive hierarchy is caused by active segregation and spatial exclusion within the patch: a small fast-moving population can outcompete a large fast-growing population by impeding its migration into the patch, while a small fast-growing population can outcompete a large fast-moving population by expelling it from the initial contact area. The resulting spatial segregation is lost for weak growth-migration trade-offs and a lack of virgin space, but is robust to population ratio, density and chemotactic ability, and is observed in both laboratory and wild strains. These findings show that motility differences and their trade-offs with growth are sufficient to promote diversity, and suggest previously undescribed roles for motility in niche formation and collective expulsion-containment strategies beyond individual search and survival.
Similar articles
-
Spatial ecology of territorial populations.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Sep 3;116(36):17874-17879. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1911570116. Epub 2019 Aug 21. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019. PMID: 31434790 Free PMC article.
-
Spatial scales of competition and a growth-motility trade-off interact to determine bacterial coexistence.R Soc Open Sci. 2022 Dec 7;9(12):211592. doi: 10.1098/rsos.211592. eCollection 2022 Dec. R Soc Open Sci. 2022. PMID: 36483758 Free PMC article.
-
Dynamic motility selection drives population segregation in a bacterial swarm.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Mar 3;117(9):4693-4700. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1917789117. Epub 2020 Feb 14. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020. PMID: 32060120 Free PMC article.
-
Multispecies Swarms of Social Microorganisms as Moving Ecosystems.Trends Microbiol. 2016 Apr;24(4):257-269. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2015.12.008. Epub 2016 Jan 25. Trends Microbiol. 2016. PMID: 26822253 Review.
-
The Ecology and Evolution of Microbial Competition.Trends Microbiol. 2016 Oct;24(10):833-845. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2016.06.011. Epub 2016 Aug 18. Trends Microbiol. 2016. PMID: 27546832 Review.
Cited by
-
Direct measurement of dynamic attractant gradients reveals breakdown of the Patlak-Keller-Segel chemotaxis model.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Jan 16;121(3):e2309251121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2309251121. Epub 2024 Jan 9. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024. PMID: 38194458 Free PMC article.
-
Convergence of Nanotechnology and Bacteriotherapy for Biomedical Applications.Adv Sci (Weinh). 2024 Apr;11(16):e2309295. doi: 10.1002/advs.202309295. Epub 2024 Feb 15. Adv Sci (Weinh). 2024. PMID: 38358998 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Light moves artificial cilia to a complex beat.Nature. 2022 May;605(7908):37-38. doi: 10.1038/d41586-022-01080-9. Nature. 2022. PMID: 35508770 No abstract available.
-
Slow expanders invade by forming dented fronts in microbial colonies.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Jan 4;119(1):e2108653119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2108653119. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022. PMID: 34983839 Free PMC article.
-
Ecological drift during colonization drives within-host and between-host heterogeneity in an animal-associated symbiont.PLoS Biol. 2024 Apr 25;22(4):e3002304. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002304. eCollection 2024 Apr. PLoS Biol. 2024. PMID: 38662791 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Rainey, P. B., Buckling, A., Kassen, R. & Travisano, M. The emergence and maintenance of diversity: insights from experimental bacterial populations. Trends Ecol. Evol. 15, 243–247 (2000). - PubMed
-
- Koskella, B., Hall, L. J. & Metcalf, C. J. E. The microbiome beyond the horizon of ecological and evolutionary theory. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 1606–1615 (2017). - PubMed
-
- Turner, P. E., Souza, V. & Lenski, R. E. Tests of ecological mechanisms promoting the stable coexistence of two bacterial genotypes. Ecology 77, 2119–2129 (1996).
-
- Ross-Gillespie, A., Gardner, A., West, S. A. & Griffin, A. S. Frequency dependence and cooperation: theory and a test with bacteria. Am. Nat. 170, 331–342 (2007). - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
