Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Feb 18;17(4):1301.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph17041301.

Socioeconomic Inequalities in Frailty in Hong Kong, China: A 14-Year Longitudinal Cohort Study

Affiliations

Socioeconomic Inequalities in Frailty in Hong Kong, China: A 14-Year Longitudinal Cohort Study

Ruby Yu et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

The prevalence of frailty varies among socioeconomic groups. However, longitudinal data for the association between subjective social status and frailty is limited. In this study, we examined whether subjective social status was associated with incident frailty. Data were obtained from a 14-year cohort of Chinese men and women (N = 694) aged 65 years and older who participated in the MrOs study-a longitudinal study on osteoporosis and general health in Hong Kong. Subjective social status at baseline (2001-2003) was assessed using a 10-rung self-anchoring scale. Incident frailty at the 14-year follow-up (2015-2017) was defined as proposed by Fried and colleagues. Ordinal logistic regressions were used to examine the association between subjective social status (high, middle, or low) and incident frailty. After adjustment for age, sex, marital status, objective socioeconomic status, medical history, lifestyle, mental health, and cognitive function, subjective social status at baseline was negatively associated with risk of developing frailty over time (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.2-4.6). In sex-stratified analysis, the social gradient in frailty was only found in men. Social inequality in frailty in men but not in women supports interventions specific to gender inequality and frailty.

Keywords: ageing; frailty; inequalities; socioeconomic status; subjective social status.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Fried L.P., Tangen C.M., Walston J., Newman A.B., Hirsch C., Gottdiener J., Seeman T., Tracy R., Kop W.J., Burke G., et al. Frailty in older adults: Evidence for a phenotype. J. Gerontol. Ser. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 2001;56:M146–M156. doi: 10.1093/gerona/56.3.M146. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Clegg A., Young J., Iliffe S., Rikkert M.O., Rockwood K. Frailty in elderly people. Lancet. 2013;381:752–762. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)62167-9. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization . WHO Clinical Consortium on Healthy Ageing Topic Focus: Frailty and Intrinsic Capacity. WHO; Geneva, Switzerland: 2017. Report of Consortium Meeting.
    1. Moody D., Lyndon H., Stevens G. Toolkit for General Practice in Supporting Older People Living with Frailty. NHS England; Leeds, UK: 2017.
    1. National Health Service . Supporting Routine Frailty Identification through the GP Contract 2017/2018. NHS England; Leeds, UK: 2018. [(accessed on 12 March 2018)]. Available online: https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/supporting-guidanc....

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources