Government R&D Subsidies, Environmental Regulations, and Their Effect on Green Innovation Efficiency of Manufacturing Industry: Evidence from the Yangtze River Economic Belt of China
- PMID: 32092916
- PMCID: PMC7068457
- DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17041330
Government R&D Subsidies, Environmental Regulations, and Their Effect on Green Innovation Efficiency of Manufacturing Industry: Evidence from the Yangtze River Economic Belt of China
Abstract
The Yangtze River Economic Belt is the most important manufacturing economic belt in China. The level of manufacturing green innovation efficiency of the Yangtze River Economic Belt directly affects the overall competitiveness of China's manufacturing industry. With panel data from 11 provinces and cities along the Yangtze River Economic Belt in China for the period of 2008 to 2017, this paper applies the slacks-based measure (SBM)-data envelopment analysis (DEA) model and panel Tobit model to conduct an empirical study of the effects of government research and development subsidies and environmental regulations on the green innovation efficiency of the manufacturing industry of the Yangtze River Economic Belt. The results show that, firstly, government R&D subsidies and environmental regulations are both conducive to improving the green innovation efficiency of the manufacturing industry of the Yangtze River Economic Belt; secondly, because of the fact that the interaction terms between government R&D subsidies and environmental regulations failed to pass the significance test, the positive moderating effects of R&D subsidies on environmental regulations and green innovation efficiency of the manufacturing industry are not obvious; thirdly, in terms of control variables, strengthening agglomeration is the only factor that is positively correlated with green innovation efficiency improvement of the manufacturing industry. Enterprise scale and industrial structure have negative effects on green innovation efficiency improvement, and the openness of economy has no correlation with green innovation efficiency.
Keywords: D subsidies; environmental regulations; government R& green innovation efficiency of manufacturing industry; panel Tobit model.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interests.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Spatial and Temporal Evolution Analysis of Industrial Green Technology Innovation Efficiency in the Yangtze River Economic Belt.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 24;19(11):6361. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19116361. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022. PMID: 35681945 Free PMC article.
-
Pathway of Green Development of Yangtze River Economics Belt from the Perspective of Green Technological Innovation and Environmental Regulation.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 5;18(19):10471. doi: 10.3390/ijerph181910471. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021. PMID: 34639770 Free PMC article.
-
Does manufacturing agglomeration promote or hinder green development efficiency? Evidence from Yangtze River Economic Belt, China.Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Jul;30(34):81801-81822. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-20537-y. Epub 2022 May 5. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023. PMID: 35513624
-
Eco-efficiency evaluation model: a case study of the Yangtze River Economic Belt.Environ Monit Assess. 2021 Jul 2;193(7):457. doi: 10.1007/s10661-021-09228-2. Environ Monit Assess. 2021. PMID: 34213656 Review.
-
The Impact of Haze Pollution on Regional Eco-Economic Treatment Efficiency in China: An Environmental Regulation Perspective.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Oct 23;16(21):4059. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16214059. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019. PMID: 31652690 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
The impact of foreign direct investment on green innovation efficiency: Evidence from Chinese provinces.PLoS One. 2024 Feb 14;19(2):e0298455. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298455. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 38354170 Free PMC article.
-
Structural characteristics and influencing factors of a spatial correlation network for tourism environmental efficiency in China.Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 1;14(1):2658. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-52434-4. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 38302514 Free PMC article.
-
Study of the collaborative prevention and control mechanisms of ecological and environmental risks in China's Yangtze River Economic Belt.PLoS One. 2023 Nov 29;18(11):e0295017. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295017. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 38019784 Free PMC article.
-
The effect exerted by environment regulation on industrial structure optimization: Evidence of 286 China's cities on the prefecture level.Heliyon. 2023 May 19;9(5):e16406. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16406. eCollection 2023 May. Heliyon. 2023. PMID: 37305478 Free PMC article.
-
67 million natural product-like compound database generated via molecular language processing.Sci Data. 2023 May 19;10(1):296. doi: 10.1038/s41597-023-02207-x. Sci Data. 2023. PMID: 37208372 Free PMC article.
References
-
- EIO . Europe in Transition: Paving the Way to a Green Economy through Eco-Innovation. European Commission; Paris, France: 2012.
-
- Kemp R., Arundel A. Survey Indicators for Environmental Innovation. STEP Group; Oslo, Norway: 1998. Idea Report.
-
- Rennings K. Redefining innovation-eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics. Ecol. Econ. 2000;32:319–332. doi: 10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00112-3. - DOI
-
- Kemp R., Pearson P. Final Report MEI Project about Measuring Eco-Innovation. Measuing Eco-innovation Project (MEI); Maastricht, The Netherlands: 2007.
-
- Horbach J., Rammer C., Rennings K. Determinants of eco-innovations by type of environmental impact—The role of regulatory push-pull, technology push and market pull. Ecol. Econ. 2012;78:112–122. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.04.005. - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
