Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2020 May;21(5):e311-e315.
doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000002257.

Factors Associated With Diagnostic Error on Admission to a PICU: A Pilot Study

Christina L Cifra  1 , Patrick Ten Eyck  2 , Jeffrey D Dawson  3 , Heather Schacht Reisinger  4   5 , Hardeep Singh  6 , Loreen A Herwaldt  4
Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Factors Associated With Diagnostic Error on Admission to a PICU: A Pilot Study

Christina L Cifra et al. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2020 May.

Abstract

Objectives: Diagnostic errors can harm critically ill children. However, we know little about their prevalence in PICUs and factors associated with error. The objective of this pilot study was to determine feasibility of record review to identify patient, provider, and work system factors associated with diagnostic errors during the first 12 hours after PICU admission.

Design: Pilot retrospective cohort study with structured record review using a structured tool (Safer Dx instrument) to identify diagnostic error.

Setting: Academic tertiary referral PICU.

Patients: Patients 0-17 years old admitted nonelectively to the PICU.

Interventions: None.

Measurements and main results: Four of 50 patients (8%) had diagnostic errors in the first 12 hours after admission. The Safer Dx instrument helped identify delayed diagnoses of chronic ear infection, increased intracranial pressure (two cases), and Bartonella encephalitis. We calculated that 610 PICU admissions are needed to achieve 80% power (α = 0.05) to detect significant associations with error.

Conclusions: Our pilot study found four patients with diagnostic error out of 50 children admitted nonelectively to a PICU. Retrospective record review using a structured tool to identify diagnostic errors is feasible in this population. Pilot data are being used to inform a larger and more definitive multicenter study.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine: Summary In: Improving Diagnosis in Health Care. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press; 2015. p. 1–18.
    1. Roland D, Snelson E: “So why didn’t you think this baby was ill?” Decision-making in acute paediatrics. Arch Dis Child 2019; 104:43–48 - PubMed
    1. Custer JW, Winters BD, Goode V, et al.: Diagnostic Errors in the Pediatric and Neonatal ICU: A Systematic Review*. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2015; 16:29–36 - PubMed
    1. Cifra CL, Jones KL, Ascenzi JA, et al.: Diagnostic Errors in a PICU: Insights From the Morbidity and Mortality Conference. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2015; 16:468–476 - PubMed
    1. Bhat PN, Costello JM, Aiyagari R, et al.: Diagnostic errors in paediatric cardiac intensive care. Cardiol Young 2018; 28:675–682 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types