Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
[Online ahead of print]

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Depressive Episodes


A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Depressive Episodes

Lais B Razza et al. Depress Anxiety.


Background: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has shown mixed results for depression treatment.

Objective: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of trials using tDCS to improve depressive symptoms.

Methods: A systematic review was performed from the first date available to January 06, 2020 in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and additional sources. We included randomized, sham-controlled clinical trials (RCTs) enrolling participants with an acute depressive episode and compared the efficacy of active versus sham tDCS, including association with other interventions. The primary outcome was the Hedges' g for continuous depression scores; secondary outcomes included odds ratios (ORs) and number needed to treat (NNT) for response, remission, and acceptability. Random effects models were employed. Sources of heterogeneity were explored via metaregression, sensitivity analyses, subgroup analyses, and bias assessment.

Results: We included 23 RCTs (25 datasets, 1,092 participants), most (57%) presenting a low risk of bias. Active tDCS was superior to sham regarding endpoint depression scores (k = 25, g = 0.46, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.22-0.70), and also achieved superior response (k = 18, 33.3% vs. 16.56%, OR = 2.28 [1.52-3.42], NNT = 6) and remission (k = 18, 19.12% vs. 9.78%, OR = 2.12 [1.42-3.16], NNT = 10.7) rates. Moreover, active tDCS was as acceptable as sham. No risk of publication bias was identified. Cumulative meta-analysis showed that effect sizes are basically unchanged since total sample reached 439 participants.

Conclusions: TDCS is modestly effective in treating depressive episodes. Further well-designed, large-scale RCTs are warranted.

Keywords: major depressive disorder; meta-analysis; systematic review; transcranial direct current stimulation.

Similar articles

See all similar articles



    1. Alonzo, A., Aaronson, S., Bikson, M., Husain, M., Lisanby, S., Martin, D., … Loo, C. (2016). Study design and methodology for a multicentre, randomised controlled trial of transcranial direct current stimulation as a treatment for unipolar and bipolar depression. Contemporary Clinical Trials, 51, 65-71.
    1. Alonzo, A., Fong, J., Ball, N., Martin, D., Chand, N., & Loo, C. (2019). Pilot trial of home-administered transcranial direct current stimulation for the treatment of depression. Journal of Affective Disorders, 252, 475-483.
    1. Aparicio, L. V. M., Guarienti, F., Razza, L. B., Carvalho, A. F., Fregni, F., & Brunoni, A. R. (2016). A systematic review on the acceptability and tolerability of transcranial direct current stimulation treatment in neuropsychiatry trials. Brain Stimulation, 9, 671-681.
    1. Aparicio, L. V. M., Rosa, V., Razza, L. M., Sampaio-Junior, B., Borrione, L., Valiengo, L., … Brunoni, A. R. (2019). Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for preventing major depressive disorder relapse: Results of a 6-month follow-up. Depression and Anxiety, 36(3), 262-268.
    1. Arroll, B., Elley, C. R., Fishman, T., Goodyear-Smith, F. A., Kenealy, T., Blashki, G., … Macgillivray, S. (2009). Antidepressants versus placebo for depression in primary care. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, CD007954.

LinkOut - more resources