Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Feb 18;11:176.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00176. eCollection 2020.

Culture Blind Leadership Research: How Semantically Determined Survey Data May Fail to Detect Cultural Differences

Affiliations
Free PMC article

Culture Blind Leadership Research: How Semantically Determined Survey Data May Fail to Detect Cultural Differences

Jan Ketil Arnulf et al. Front Psychol. .
Free PMC article

Abstract

Likert scale surveys are frequently used in cross-cultural studies on leadership. Recent publications using digital text algorithms raise doubt about the source of variation in statistics from such studies to the extent that they are semantically driven. The Semantic Theory of Survey Response (STSR) predicts that in the case of semantically determined answers, the response patterns may also be predictable across languages. The Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ) was applied to 11 different ethnic samples in English, Norwegian, German, Urdu and Chinese. Semantic algorithms predicted responses significantly across all conditions, although to varying degree. Comparisons of Norwegian, German, Urdu and Chinese samples in native versus English language versions suggest that observed differences are not culturally dependent but caused by different translations and understanding. The maximum variance attributable to culture was a 5% unique overlap of variation in the two Chinese samples. These findings question the capability of traditional surveys to detect cultural differences. It also indicates that cross-cultural leadership research may risk lack of practical relevance.

Keywords: Likert scales; cross-cultural studies; latent semantic analysis; organizational behavior; semantic versus empirical problems.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Linguistic sub-samples and semantics in rotated 2 factor PCA.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. AERA, APA, and NCME (2014). Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
    1. Andrich D. (1996). A hyperbolic cosine latent trait model for unfolding polytomous responses: reconciling thurstone and likert methodologies. Br. J. Math. Statist. Psychol. 49 347–365. 10.1111/j.2044-8317.1996.tb01093.x - DOI
    1. Aoki K. (2008). Transferring Japanese kaizen activities to overseas plants in China. Int. J. Operat. Product. Manag. 28 518–539. 10.1108/01443570810875340 - DOI
    1. Arnulf J. K. (2020). “Wittgenstein’s revenge: how semantic algorithms can help survey research escape smedslund’s labyrinth,” in Respect for Thought; Jan Smedslund’s Legacy for Psychology, eds Lindstad T. G., Stänicke E., Valsiner J., editors. (Berlin: Springer; ).
    1. Arnulf J. K., Larsen K. R. (2015). Overlapping semantics of leadership and heroism: expectations of omnipotence, identification with ideal leaders and disappointment in real managers. Scand. Psychol. 2:e3 10.15714/scandpsychol.2.e3 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources

Feedback