Black and Hispanic women are less likely than white women to receive guideline-concordant endometrial cancer treatment

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Sep;223(3):398.e1-398.e18. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.02.041. Epub 2020 Mar 3.

Abstract

Background: Differences in receipt of guideline-concordant treatment might underlie well-established racial disparities in endometrial cancer mortality.

Objective: Using the National Cancer Database, we assessed the hypothesis that among women with endometrioid endometrial cancer, racial/ethnic minority women would have lower odds of receiving guideline-concordant treatment than white women. In addition, we hypothesized that lack of guideline-concordant treatment was linked with worse survival.

Study design: We defined receipt of guideline-concordant treatment using the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to compute odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for associations between race and guideline-concordant treatment. We used multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models to estimate hazards ratios and 95% confidence intervals for relationships between guideline-concordant treatment and overall survival in the overall study population and stratified by race/ethnicity.

Results: This analysis was restricted to the 89,319 women diagnosed with an invasive, endometrioid endometrial cancer between 2004 and 2014. Overall, 74.7% of the cohort received guideline-concordant treatment (n = 66,699). Analyses stratified by race showed that 75.3% of non-Hispanic white (n = 57,442), 70.1% of non-Hispanic black (n = 4334), 71.0% of Hispanic (n = 3263), and 72.5% of Asian/Pacific Islander patients (n = 1660) received treatment in concordance with guidelines. In multivariable-adjusted models, non-Hispanic black (odds ratio, 0.92, 95% confidence interval, 0.86-0.98) and Hispanic women (odds ratio, 0.90, 95% confidence internal, 0.83-0.97) had lower odds of receiving guideline-concordant treatment compared with non-Hispanic white women, while Asian/Pacific Islander women had a higher odds of receiving guideline-concordant treatment (odds ratio, 1.11, 95% confidence interval, 1.00-1.23). Lack of guideline-concordant treatment was associated with lower overall survival in the overall study population (hazard ratio, 1.12, 95% confidence interval, 1.08-1.15) but was not significantly associated with overall survival among non-Hispanic black (hazard ratio, 1.09, 95% confidence interval, 0.98-1.21), Hispanic (hazard ratio, 0.92, 95% confidence interval=0.78-1.09), or Asian/Pacific Islander (hazard ratio, 0.90, 95% confidence interval, 0.70-1.16) women.

Conclusion: Non-Hispanic black and Hispanic women were less likely than non-Hispanic white women to receive guideline-concordant treatment, while Asian/Pacific Islander women more commonly received treatment in line with guidelines. Furthermore, in the overall study population, overall survival was worse among those not receiving guideline-concordant treatment, although low power may have had an impact on the race-stratified models. Future studies should evaluate reasons underlying disparate endometrial cancer treatment.

Keywords: chemotherapy; disparities; guideline-concordant treatment; hospital-based cancer registry; race; radiation treatment; uterus neoplasm.

Publication types

  • Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Black or African American
  • Carcinoma, Endometrioid / ethnology
  • Carcinoma, Endometrioid / mortality
  • Carcinoma, Endometrioid / therapy*
  • Endometrial Neoplasms / ethnology
  • Endometrial Neoplasms / mortality
  • Endometrial Neoplasms / therapy*
  • Ethnicity
  • Female
  • Guideline Adherence / statistics & numerical data*
  • Healthcare Disparities / ethnology*
  • Hispanic or Latino
  • Humans
  • Middle Aged
  • Minority Groups
  • Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander
  • Neoplasm Staging
  • Odds Ratio
  • Proportional Hazards Models
  • Survival Rate
  • White People