Modeling residential water demand: An approach based on household demand systems
- PMID: 32148251
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109921
Modeling residential water demand: An approach based on household demand systems
Abstract
Most estimations of residential water demand are based on single-equation models that rely on assumptions that are most often not compatible with the fundamental principles of consumer theory. In this paper, we relax these assumptions by using a more flexible system of demand estimation, the Quadratic Almost Ideal Demand System (QUAIDS) (Banks et al., 1997) and reveal the existence in our sample of substitution and complementary patterns as well as non-linearities in Engel curves for water consumption. Water demand would not be, therefore, linear in income and separable from other goods consumed within the household. In this context the QUAIDS functional specification is expected to be more consistent with observed consumer behavior. Our results seem to confirm this expectation; when compared to the linear, log-linear and double-log models commonly used in water demand estimation, QUAIDS seems to produce a better overall fit and a better fit to the asymmetric shape of the real distribution of water consumption. This has important implications in terms of public policy, as it allows to explore how water policies interact with other goods consumed within the household (e.g. water-energy nexus or efficient household appliances). Furthermore, differential responses to pricing policies and taxes across the income distribution can be considered, thus contributing to avoid undesired redistributive effects and water poverty.
Keywords: Consumer welfare; Cross-price elasticity; Pricing policies; QUAIDS; Residential water demand; Water management.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of competing interest The authors hereby report that there is not any financial and personal relationships with other people or organizations that could inappropriately influence or bias their work.
Similar articles
-
How would the carbon tax on energy commodities affect consumer welfare? Evidence from China's household energy consumption system.J Environ Manage. 2022 Sep 1;317:115466. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115466. Epub 2022 Jun 12. J Environ Manage. 2022. PMID: 35751267
-
Are lower income smokers more price sensitive?: the evidence from Korean cigarette tax increases.Tob Control. 2016 Mar;25(2):141-6. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051680. Epub 2014 Nov 27. Tob Control. 2016. PMID: 25430738
-
Consumption function and price elasticity of tobacco demand in Nigeria.Tob Prev Cessat. 2019 Dec 6;5:48. doi: 10.18332/tpc/114084. eCollection 2019. Tob Prev Cessat. 2019. PMID: 32411910 Free PMC article.
-
[Tobacco taxes, prices and demand for tobacco products: a comparative analysis].Gac Sanit. 2002 Sep-Oct;16(5):425-35. doi: 10.1016/s0213-9111(02)71952-3. Gac Sanit. 2002. PMID: 12372188 Review. Spanish.
-
Pricing as a means of controlling alcohol consumption.Br Med Bull. 2017 Sep 1;123(1):149-158. doi: 10.1093/bmb/ldx020. Br Med Bull. 2017. PMID: 28910991 Review.
Cited by
-
The effects of taxing sugar-sweetened beverages in Ecuador: An analysis across different income and consumption groups.PLoS One. 2020 Oct 13;15(10):e0240546. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240546. eCollection 2020. PLoS One. 2020. PMID: 33048990 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
