[Short-Term Comparison between Trans-Anal Ileus Tube and Self-Expandable Metallic Stent for Obstructive Colorectal Cancer]

Koji Numata; Mio Yasukawa; Soji Toda; Yuto Kamioka; Hideaki Suematsu; Kazuhito Tsuchida; Akio Higuchi; Hiroyuki Saeki; Yasushi Rino; Munetaka Masuda; Hiroshi Matsukawa

[Short-Term Comparison between Trans-Anal Ileus Tube and Self-Expandable Metallic Stent for Obstructive Colorectal Cancer]

Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2019 Dec;46(13):1911-1913.

[Article in Japanese]

Authors

Koji Numata¹, Mio Yasukawa, Soji Toda, Yuto Kamioka, Hideaki Suematsu, Kazuhito Tsuchida, Akio Higuchi, Hiroyuki Saeki, Yasushi Rino, Munetaka Masuda, Hiroshi Matsukawa

Affiliation

¹ Dept. of Surgery, Yokohama Minami Kyosai Hospital.

PMID: 32157010

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the outcome of using trans-anal ileus tube and self-expandable metallic stent(SEMS) for obstructive colorectal cancer.

Methods: Between 2014 and 2018, 14 patients received trans-anal ileus tube placement (group I)and 34 received SEMS insertion as bridge to surgery(BTS)and underwent primary resection.

Results: The technical success rate was 100%in both groups, and the clinical success rate was 85.7%(12/14 cases)in group I and 91.2%(31/34 cases)in group S. In group S, the CROSS score significantly improved, the rates of stoma construction and postoperative complications were significantly lower, and the period until oral intake and hospital discharge was significantly short.

Conclusion: SEMS insertion is more effective than trans-anal ileus tube placement in terms of short-term outcome.

Publication types

Comparative Study

MeSH terms

Colorectal Neoplasms* / complications
Humans
Ileus* / etiology
Ileus* / surgery
Retrospective Studies
Self Expandable Metallic Stents*
Stents
Treatment Outcome