Patients' Perspectives of Diagnostic Error: A Qualitative Study
- PMID: 32168272
- DOI: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000642
Patients' Perspectives of Diagnostic Error: A Qualitative Study
Abstract
Objectives: The Institute of Medicine (IOM) defines diagnostic error as the failure to establish an accurate or timely explanation for the patient's health problem(s) or effectively communicate the explanation to the patient. Using this definition, we sought to characterize diagnostic errors experienced by patients and describe patient perspectives on causes, impacts, and prevention strategies.
Methods: We conducted interviews of adults hospitalized at an academic medical center. We used the framework of the IOM definition of diagnostic error to perform thematic analysis of qualitative data. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize quantitative data.
Results: Based on the IOM's definition of diagnostic error, 27 of the 69 included patients reported at least one diagnostic error in the past 5 years. The errors were distributed evenly across the following three dimensions of the IOM definition: accuracy, communication, and timeliness. Limited time with doctors, communication, clinical assessment, and clinical management emerged as major themes for causes of diagnostic error and for strategies to reduce diagnostic error. Impacts of errors included emotional distress, adverse health outcomes, and impaired activities of daily living.
Conclusions: This study uses the recent IOM definition of diagnostic error to provide insights into diagnostic error from the patient perspective. We found that diagnostic errors were commonly reported by hospitalized adults and have a profound impact on patients' well-being. Patients' insights regarding potential causes and prevention strategies may help identify opportunities to reduce diagnostic errors.
Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
J.C. receives royalties from Jones and Bartlett Learning from the book, Controversies in Public Health and Health Policy, 2016. The other authors disclose no conflict of interest.
Similar articles
-
Defining Diagnostic Error: A Scoping Review to Assess the Impact of the National Academies' Report Improving Diagnosis in Health Care.J Patient Saf. 2022 Dec 1;18(8):770-778. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000999. Epub 2022 Apr 27. J Patient Saf. 2022. PMID: 35405723 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001. JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009. PMID: 27819974
-
Evidence Brief: The Quality of Care Provided by Advanced Practice Nurses [Internet].Washington (DC): Department of Veterans Affairs (US); 2014 Sep. Washington (DC): Department of Veterans Affairs (US); 2014 Sep. PMID: 27606392 Free Books & Documents. Review.
-
Avoiding and identifying errors in health technology assessment models: qualitative study and methodological review.Health Technol Assess. 2010 May;14(25):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-107. doi: 10.3310/hta14250. Health Technol Assess. 2010. PMID: 20501062 Review.
-
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 36321557 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Diagnostic Errors in Obstetric Morbidity and Mortality: Methods for and Challenges in Seeking Diagnostic Excellence.J Clin Med. 2024 Jul 20;13(14):4245. doi: 10.3390/jcm13144245. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 39064285 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Patient-reported outcome and experience domains for diagnostic excellence: a scoping review to inform future measure development.Qual Life Res. 2024 Nov;33(11):2883-2897. doi: 10.1007/s11136-024-03709-w. Epub 2024 Jun 8. Qual Life Res. 2024. PMID: 38850395 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Frontline Providers' and Patients' Perspectives on Improving Diagnostic Safety in the Emergency Department: A Qualitative Study.Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2024 Jul;50(7):480-491. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2024.03.003. Epub 2024 Mar 12. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2024. PMID: 38643047 Free PMC article.
-
Exploring Clinical Lessons Learned by Experienced Hospitalists from Diagnostic Errors and Successes.J Gen Intern Med. 2024 Jun;39(8):1386-1392. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-08625-w. Epub 2024 Jan 26. J Gen Intern Med. 2024. PMID: 38277023
-
Patient Reasoning: Patients' and Care Partners' Perceptions of Diagnostic Accuracy in Emergency Care.Med Decis Making. 2024 Jan;44(1):102-111. doi: 10.1177/0272989X231207829. Epub 2023 Nov 15. Med Decis Making. 2024. PMID: 37965762 Free PMC article.
References
-
- National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Improving Diagnosis in Health Care . Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2015.
-
- Graber ML. The incidence of diagnostic error in medicine. BMJ Qual Saf . 2013;22:ii21–ii27.
-
- Leape LL, Brennan TA, Laird N, et al. The nature of adverse events in hospitalized patients. Results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study II. N Engl J Med . 1991;324:377–384.
-
- Singh H, Meyer AN, Thomas EJ. The frequency of diagnostic errors in outpatient care: estimations from three large observational studies involving US adult populations. BMJ Qual Saf . 2014;23:727–731.
-
- NORC at the University of Chicago and IHI/NPSF Lucian Leape Institute. Americans’ Experiences with Medical Errors and Views on Patient Safety . Cambridge, MA: Institute for Healthcare Improvement and NORC at the University of Chicago; 2017.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous
