Introduction: The EQ-5D-3L (3L) and EQ-5D-5L (5L) are both frequently used measures of health status. Previous studies have found the EQ-5D-5L to have superior measurement properties but no study has compared the two measures in a large general population survey using matched respondents.
Methods: Using data from the GP Patient Survey, coarsened exact matching was used to match individuals completing the 3L in 2011 with those completing the 5L in 2012. Measurement properties were assessed for a general population and multimorbid population (chronic conditions ≥ 2), with ceiling effects, informativity and distribution of response compared. Changes in the direction of response, as well as the impact on utility distributions, were quantified.
Results: Matching resulted in a cohort of 1,023,218 respondents (2011: 511,609; 2012: 511,609) for analysis. Ceiling effects for the 5L were lower than the 3L (43.8% vs. 54.4%). The 5L had improved informativity and broader spread of responses than the 3L (5L top 50 profiles: 77.4% vs. 3L: 98.8%). Overall, there was an upwards shift in utility values for the 5L versus the 3L as respondents using the 5L reported ill health more frequently but with less severity. Measurement improvements and effects on utility values were more pronounced for the multimorbid population.
Conclusion: The 5L had superior measurement properties than the 3L and should be preferred in general population surveys and for use in individuals with multimorbidity. At increasing levels of morbidity, the 5L is currently associated with higher utility values than the 3L.
The EQ-5D-5L Is Superior to the -3L Version in Measuring Health-related Quality of Life in Patients Awaiting THA or TKA.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 Jul;477(7):1632-1644. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000662. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019. PMID: 30801280
Comparing the EQ-5D 3L and 5L: measurement properties and association with chronic conditions and multimorbidity in the general population.Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014 May 16;12:74. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-12-74. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014. PMID: 24885017 Free PMC article.
Parallel Valuation: A Direct Comparison of EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L Societal Value Sets.Med Decis Making. 2018 Nov;38(8):968-982. doi: 10.1177/0272989X18802797. Med Decis Making. 2018. PMID: 30403577
Assessing the health of the general population in England: how do the three- and five-level versions of EQ-5D compare?Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2015 Oct 21;13:171. doi: 10.1186/s12955-015-0356-8. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2015. PMID: 26489956 Free PMC article.
Assessment of the construct validity and responsiveness of preference-based quality of life measures in people with Parkinson's: a systematic review.Qual Life Res. 2017 Jan;26(1):1-23. doi: 10.1007/s11136-016-1428-x. Epub 2016 Oct 24. Qual Life Res. 2017. PMID: 27778141 Review.