Regret among primary care physicians: a survey of diagnostic decisions
- PMID: 32183738
- PMCID: PMC7079478
- DOI: 10.1186/s12875-020-01125-w
Regret among primary care physicians: a survey of diagnostic decisions
Abstract
Background: Experienced and anticipated regret influence physicians' decision-making. In medicine, diagnostic decisions and diagnostic errors can have a severe impact on both patients and physicians. Little empirical research exists on regret experienced by physicians when they make diagnostic decisions in primary care that later prove inappropriate or incorrect. The aim of this study was to explore the experience of regret following diagnostic decisions in primary care.
Methods: In this qualitative study, we used an online questionnaire on a sample of German primary care physicians. We asked participants to report on cases in which the final diagnosis differed from their original opinion, and in which treatment was at the very least delayed, possibly resulting in harm to the patient. We asked about original and final diagnoses, illness trajectories, and the reactions of other physicians, patients and relatives. We used thematic analysis to assess the data, supported by MAXQDA 11 and Microsoft Excel 2016.
Results: 29 GPs described one case each (14 female/15 male patients, aged 1.5-80 years, response rate < 1%). In 26 of 29 cases, the final diagnosis was more serious than the original diagnosis. In two cases, the diagnoses were equally serious, and in one case less serious. Clinical trajectories and the reactions of patients and relatives differed widely. Although only one third of cases involved preventable harm to patients, the vast majority (27 of 29) of physicians expressed deep feelings of regret.
Conclusion: Even if harm to patients is unavoidable, regret following diagnostic decisions can be devastating for clinicians, making them 'second victims'. Procedures and tools are needed to analyse cases involving undesirable diagnostic events, so that 'true' diagnostic errors, in which harm could have been prevented, can be distinguished from others. Further studies should also explore how physicians can be supported in dealing with such events in order to prevent them from practicing defensive medicine.
Keywords: Diagnostic error; General practice; Patient safety; Primary health care; Regret; Uncertainty.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Similar articles
-
Primary care physicians' willingness to disclose oncology errors involving multiple providers to patients.BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Oct;25(10):787-95. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004353. Epub 2015 Nov 3. BMJ Qual Saf. 2016. PMID: 26534996
-
Perceptions, motivations and decision regret surrounding preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy.Hum Reprod. 2020 Sep 1;35(9):2047-2057. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaa154. Hum Reprod. 2020. PMID: 32756971
-
Thresholds, rules and defensive strategies: how physicians learn from their prior diagnosis-related experiences.Diagnosis (Berl). 2020 May 26;7(2):115-121. doi: 10.1515/dx-2019-0025. Diagnosis (Berl). 2020. PMID: 31647779
-
Managing diagnostic uncertainty in primary care: a systematic critical review.BMC Fam Pract. 2017 Aug 7;18(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s12875-017-0650-0. BMC Fam Pract. 2017. PMID: 28784088 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Diagnosing diagnostic error.Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care. 2013 Oct;43(9):227-31. doi: 10.1016/j.cppeds.2013.07.002. Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care. 2013. PMID: 24070579 Review.
Cited by
-
Accuracy of Telehealth Visits for Acute Care Needs in Family Medicine.Cureus. 2024 May 3;16(5):e59569. doi: 10.7759/cureus.59569. eCollection 2024 May. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 38832206 Free PMC article.
-
Applicability and Validity of Second Victim Assessment Instruments among General Practitioners and Healthcare Assistants (SEVID-IX Study).Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Jan 30;12(3):351. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12030351. Healthcare (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38338236 Free PMC article.
-
Blackbox error management: how do practices deal with critical incidents in everyday practice? A qualitative interview study.BMC Prim Care. 2023 Nov 29;24(1):251. doi: 10.1186/s12875-023-02206-2. BMC Prim Care. 2023. PMID: 38030963 Free PMC article.
-
How defensive medicine is defined in European medical literature: a systematic review.BMJ Open. 2022 Jan 20;12(1):e057169. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057169. BMJ Open. 2022. PMID: 35058268 Free PMC article.
-
Regret and Therapeutic Decisions in Multiple Sclerosis Care: Literature Review and Research Protocol.Front Neurol. 2021 Jun 21;12:675520. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.675520. eCollection 2021. Front Neurol. 2021. PMID: 34234734 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Roese NJ, Epstude K, Fessel F, Morrison M, Smallman R, Summerville A, et al. Repetitive regret, depression, and anxiety: findings from a nationally representative survey. J Soc Clin Psychol. 2009;28:671–688. doi: 10.1521/jscp.2009.28.6.671. - DOI
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
