Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Mar 18;11(1):1433.
doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-15099-x.

Stable Species Boundaries Despite Ten Million Years of Hybridization in Tropical Eels

Affiliations
Free PMC article

Stable Species Boundaries Despite Ten Million Years of Hybridization in Tropical Eels

Julia M I Barth et al. Nat Commun. .
Free PMC article

Abstract

Genomic evidence is increasingly underpinning that hybridization between taxa is commonplace, challenging our views on the mechanisms that maintain their boundaries. Here, we focus on seven catadromous eel species (genus Anguilla) and use genome-wide sequence data from more than 450 individuals sampled across the tropical Indo-Pacific, morphological information, and three newly assembled draft genomes to compare contemporary patterns of hybridization with signatures of past introgression across a time-calibrated phylogeny. We show that the seven species have remained distinct for up to 10 million years and find that the current frequencies of hybridization across species pairs contrast with genomic signatures of past introgression. Based on near-complete asymmetry in the directionality of hybridization and decreasing frequencies of later-generation hybrids, we suggest cytonuclear incompatibilities, hybrid breakdown, and purifying selection as mechanisms that can support species cohesion even when hybridization has been pervasive throughout the evolutionary history of clades.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Genomic and morphological variation in tropical eels.
a Distribution of Anguilla species in the Indo-Pacific. The color and position of dots within hexagons indicate species presence within the region covered by the hexagon, according to the Global Biodiversity Information Facility database and our own collection. Sampling locations are indicated with black dots. Numbers following location names specify the number of samples taken. Stacked bars indicate the species identities of individuals, according to mitochondrial and morphological species assignment. b Morphological variation among the four species Amarmorata (n = 100), Amegastoma (n = 30), Aobscura (n = 30), and Ainterioris (n = 1). Dots represent individuals and are colored according to mitochondrial species identity. c Genomic principal component analysis (PCA) based on 155,896 variable sites. Specimen IDs are given for individuals with intermediate genotypes. The cyan circle indicates a cluster of 11 individuals mitochondrially assigned to Amarmorata (SAA16011, SAA16012, SAA16013, SAA16027, SAW17B27, SAW17B49, VAG12012, VAG12018, VAG12019, VAG13071, VAG13078), in addition to the highlighted VAG12044 that is mitochondrially assigned to Amegastoma. d Time-calibrated phylogeny based on 5000 transition sites. Each individual tree shown in gray represents a sample from the posterior tree distribution; a maximum-clade-credibility summary tree is shown in black. Color code in b, c, and d is identical to a. PC, principal component; AD, distance between the dorsal fin and the anus; PDH, predorsal length without head length; TL, total length.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Contemporary hybridization among tropical eels.
ad Genomic variation inferred in a PCA of all individuals of Amarmorata, Amegastoma, Aobscura, and Ainterioris (Supplementary Fig. 5c), shown separately for four hybridizing species pairs: Amarmorata and Amegastoma (a), Amarmorata and Aobscura (b), Amegastoma and Aobscura (c), and Amarmorata and Ainterioris (d). Individuals with intermediate positions are marked in gray with specimen IDs; species color code is as in Fig. 1. e Ancestry painting for 20 hybrids between Amarmorata and Amegastoma. The top and bottom horizontal bars represent 302 sites that are fixed for different alleles between the two species; all other bars indicate the alleles at each of those sites. White color indicates missing data. Heterozygous alleles are shown with the top half in each bar matching the second parental species and vice versa. f Ancestry painting for three contemporary hybrids between Amarmorata and Aobscura, based on 742 sites fixed between these two species. g Ancestry painting for one hybrid between Amegastoma and Aobscura, based on 525 fixed sites. h Ancestry painting for one hybrid between Amarmorata and Ainterioris, based on 429 fixed sites. i Histogram of heterozygosity observed in hybrids. j Histogram of the proportions of hybrid genomes derived from the maternal species (according to mitochondrial sequence data). k Histogram of the relative morphological similarities between hybrids and the maternal species, measured as the relative proximity to the mean maternal phenotypes, compared to the proximity to the mean paternal phenotype. l Comparison of the proportions of hybrids’ genomes derived from the maternal species and the similarity to the mean maternal species’ phenotype. The dotted line indicates a significant positive correlation between the two measures (two-tailed t test; t = 3.1, p = 0.008, R2 = 0.381). PC, principal component; mito., mitochondrial genome; AD, distance between the dorsal fin and the anus; PDH, predorsal length without head; TL, total length.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Past introgression among tropical eels.
a Likelihood support of individual RAD loci for different relationships of Ainterioris: as sister to Amarmorata and Aluzonensis (bottom left), as sister to Aobscura and Abicolor (bottom right), and as sister to a clade formed by those four species (top). The position of each dot shows the relative likelihood support of one RAD locus for each of the three tested relationships, with a distance corresponding to a log-likelihood difference of 10 indicated by the scale bar. The central triangle connects the mean relative likelihood support for each relationship. A black dot inside that triangle marks the central position corresponding to equal support for all three relationships. Sample sizes (n) report the number of loci that support each of the two competing relationships connected by that edge. b Heatmap indicating maximum pairwise D (above diagonal) and f4 (below diagonal) statistics (see Table 1). Combinations marked with “x” symbols indicate sister taxa; introgression between these could not be assessed. Asterisks indicate the significance of f4 values (*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; not adjusted for multiple comparisons; see Table 1 for precise values), determined through one-sided comparison with coalescent simulations with the F4 software. The cladogram on the left summarizes the species-tree topology according to a and the significant signals of introgression according to b. c, d Comparisons of the maximum D value per species with the species' geographic range or population mutation rate Θ. Geographic range was measured as the number of geographic hexagons (see Fig. 1) in which the species is present, and Watterson’s estimator was used for the population mutation rate Θ. n.s. not significant. e Genomic patterns of phylogenetic relationships among Amarmorata, Aobscura, and Amegastoma, based on WGS reads mapped to the 11 largest scaffolds (those longer than 5 Mbp) of the Aanguilla reference genome. Blocks in light gray show 20,000-bp regions (incremented by 10,000 bp) in which Amarmorata and Aobscura appear as sister species, in agreement with the inferred species tree; in other blocks, Amegastoma appears closer to either Aobscura (gray) or Amarmorata (dark gray).
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. Potential causes of cytonuclear incompatibility between Amarmorata and Amegastoma.
a Dot plot visualizing an inversion between Amegastoma scaffold scf7180010919884 (purple) and the homologous Amarmorata scaffold scf7180010922493 (cyan). Each dot represents a tuple of nine nucleotides that are identical or the reverse complement between the two scaffolds. Light gray rectangles mark regions homologous to exons of the zebrafish (Danio rerio) myhc4 gene; order and orientation of these exons are indicated at the top (Supplementary Table 12). The inversion may thus affect the transcript of this gene in Amegastoma. Other detected genomic rearrangements are shown in Supplementary Figs. 21 and 22. b Illustration of fixed sites in coding sequences between Amarmorata and Amegastoma. Light gray rectangles mark regions homologous to exons of the zebrafish ttna gene (Supplementary Table 14). Dark gray lines indicate RAD sequences for 72 and 26 “core” individuals of Amarmorata and Amegastoma, respectively. Nonreference genotypes are colored according to the species in which the genotype is most frequently found. Within exon 191, an adenine to guanosine substitution in Amarmorata at position 32,226 of Aanguilla scaffold scf1929 changes amino acid 5732 of the protein from aspartic acid to glycine. Other protein-coding sites fixed between Amarmorata and Amegastoma are listed in Supplementary Table 13. c Nonsynonymous substitutions between the Amarmorata (inner, cyan circle) and Amegastoma (outer, purple circle) mitochondrial genomes. Gray segments indicate protein-coding genes and nonsynonymous substitutions within these are shown with black lines. All mitochondrial amino-acid changes are listed in Supplementary Table 15.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Mallet J. Hybridization as an invasion of the genome. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2005;20:229–237. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2005.02.010. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mallet J. Hybrid speciation. Nature. 2007;446:279–283. doi: 10.1038/nature05706. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Abbott R, et al. Hybridization and speciation. J. Evol. Biol. 2013;26:229–246. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2012.02599.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Taylor SA, Larson EL. Insights from genomes into the evolutionary importance and prevalence of hybridization in nature. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2019;3:170–177. doi: 10.1038/s41559-018-0777-y. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Meier JI, et al. Ancient hybridization fuels rapid cichlid fish adaptive radiations. Nat. Commun. 2017;8:14363. doi: 10.1038/ncomms14363. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Feedback