Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2021 Apr;85(3):1221-1233.
doi: 10.1007/s00426-020-01316-1. Epub 2020 Mar 20.

Lower limb peripersonal space and the desire to amputate a leg

Affiliations
Free PMC article
Comparative Study

Lower limb peripersonal space and the desire to amputate a leg

Kayla D Stone et al. Psychol Res. 2021 Apr.
Free PMC article

Abstract

Body integrity identity disorder (BIID) is a rare condition defined by a persistent desire to amputate or paralyze a healthy limb (usually one or both of the legs). This desire arises from experiencing a mismatch between the internal body model and the actual physical/functional boundaries of the body. People with BIID show an abnormal physiological response to stimuli approaching the affected (unwanted) but not the unaffected leg, which might suggest a retracted peripersonal space (PPS: a multisensory integration zone near the body) around the unwanted limb. Thus, using a visuo-tactile interaction task, we examined leg PPS in a group of healthy men and three men with BIID who desired unilateral leg amputation. PPS size (~ 70 cm) around the unwanted BIID legs did not differ from that of healthy controls. Although the leg feels foreign in BIID, it still seems to maintain a PPS, presumably to protect it and facilitate interactions within the surrounding environment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

KDS declares she has no conflict of interest. CAEK declares she has no conflict of interest. MME declares she has no conflict of interest. HCD declares he has no conflict of interest. RMB declares she has no conflict of interest. AK declares she has no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
a Pictorial example of visuo-tactile interaction task for the right foot. b Bird’s eye view of task setup. The horizontal grey-dashed arrow indicates the visual stimulus (red circle) trajectory. The stars represent possible points (and thereby distances from the toe) in which a tactile stimulation to the toe could be given. D represents visual stimulus distance from the toe and T represents time in milliseconds from the start of the trial. Ds and Ts have been rounded to the nearest whole number
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Mean reaction times (represented as red opaque circles) and sigmoidal fits (red lines) for the right leg of individual control participants (represented a P for participant followed by participant number). The y-axis represents the reaction time (RT) in milliseconds and the x-axis represents the distance from the foot (in centimeters) that the visual stimulus was located when the tactile stimulus was administered
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Mean reaction times (represented as blue opaque circles) and sigmoidal fits (blue lines) for the left leg of individual control participants (represented a P for participant followed by participant number). The y-axis represents the reaction time (RT) in milliseconds and the x-axis represents the distance from the foot (in centimeters) that the visual stimulus was located when the tactile stimulus was administered
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Mean reaction times (represented as opaque circles) and sigmoidal fits (for the right legs (top row, in red) and left legs (bottom row, in blue) of individual BIID participants (participant number and affected leg as title for each plot). The y-axis represents the reaction time (RT) in milliseconds and the x-axis represents the distance from the foot (in centimeters) that the visual stimulus was located when the tactile stimulus was administered

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Aoyama A, Krummenacher P, Palla A, et al. Impaired spatial-temporal integration of touch in xenomelia (body integrity identity disorder) Spatial Cognition & Computation. 2012;12:96–110. doi: 10.1080/13875868.2011.603773. - DOI
    1. Ardizzi M, Ferri F. Interoceptive influences on peripersonal space boundary. Cognition. 2018;177:79–86. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.04.001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bassolino M, Serino A, Ubaldi S, Làdavas E. Everyday use of the computer mouse extends peripersonal space representation. Neuropsychologia. 2010;48:803–811. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.11.009. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bensler JM, Paauw DS. Apotemnophilia masquerading as medical morbidity. (Case report) Southern Medical Journal. 2003;96:674–677. doi: 10.1097/01.SMJ.0000078367.94479.B9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Blom RM, Guglielmi V, Denys D. Elective amputation of a “healthy limb”. CNS Spectrums. 2016;21:360–361. doi: 10.1017/S1092852916000456. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources