Multicenter Emergency Department Validation of the Canadian Syncope Risk Score
- PMID: 32202605
- PMCID: PMC7091474
- DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.0288
Multicenter Emergency Department Validation of the Canadian Syncope Risk Score
Abstract
Importance: The management of patients with syncope in the emergency department (ED) is challenging because no robust risk tool available has been recommended for clinical use.
Objective: To validate the Canadian Syncope Risk Score (CSRS) in a new cohort of patients with syncope to determine its ability to predict 30-day serious outcomes not evident during index ED evaluation.
Design, setting, and participants: This prospective multicenter cohort study conducted at 9 EDs across Canada included patients 16 years and older who presented to EDs within 24 hours of syncope. Patients were enrolled from March 2014 to April 2018.
Main outcomes and measures: Baseline characteristics, CSRS predictors, and 30-day adjudicated serious outcomes, including arrhythmic (arrhythmias, interventions for arrhythmia, or unknown cause of death) and nonarrhythmic (myocardial infarction, structural heart disease, pulmonary embolism, or hemorrhage) serious outcomes, were collected. Calibration and discrimination characteristics for CSRS validation were calculated.
Results: A total of 3819 patients were included (mean [SD] age 53.9 [22.8] years; 2088 [54.7%] female), of whom 139 (3.6%) experienced 30-day serious outcomes, including 13 patients (0.3%) who died. In the validation cohort, there were no differences between the predicted and observed risk, the calibration slope was 1.0, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.91 (95% CI, 0.88-0.93). The empirical probability of a 30-day serious outcome during validation was 3.64% (95% CI, 3.09%-4.28%) compared with the model-predicted probability of 3.17% (95% CI, 2.66%-3.77%; P = .26). The proportion of patients with 30-day serious outcomes increased from 3 of 1631 (0.3%) in the very-low-risk group to 40 of 78 (51.3%) in the very-high-risk group (Cochran-Armitage trend test P < .001). There was a similar significant increase in the serious outcome subtypes with increasing CSRS risk category. None of the very-low-risk and low-risk patients died or experienced ventricular arrhythmia. At a threshold score of -1 (2145 of 3819 patients), the CSRS sensitivity and specificity were 97.8% (95% CI, 93.8%-99.6%) and 44.3% (95% CI, 42.7%-45.9%), respectively.
Conclusions and relevance: The CSRS was successfully validated and its use is recommended to guide ED management of patients when serious causes are not identified during index ED evaluation. Very-low-risk and low-risk patients can generally be discharged, while brief hospitalization can be considered for high-risk patients. We believe CSRS implementation has the potential to improve patient safety and health care efficiency.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
Comment in
-
Can the Canadian Syncope Risk Score (CSRS) help to risk stratify emergency department patients presenting with syncope without an evident serious cause?CJEM. 2021 Jan;23(1):34-35. doi: 10.1007/s43678-020-00020-8. Epub 2020 Dec 10. CJEM. 2021. PMID: 33683606 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Duration of Electrocardiographic Monitoring of Emergency Department Patients With Syncope.Circulation. 2019 Mar 12;139(11):1396-1406. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.036088. Circulation. 2019. PMID: 30661373
-
Personalised risk prediction following emergency department assessment for syncope.Emerg Med J. 2022 Jul;39(7):501-507. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2020-211095. Epub 2021 Nov 5. Emerg Med J. 2022. PMID: 34740890
-
Development of the Canadian Syncope Risk Score to predict serious adverse events after emergency department assessment of syncope.CMAJ. 2016 Sep 6;188(12):E289-E298. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.151469. Epub 2016 Jul 4. CMAJ. 2016. PMID: 27378464 Free PMC article.
-
Can I Send This Syncope Patient Home From the Emergency Department?J Emerg Med. 2021 Dec;61(6):801-809. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2021.07.060. Epub 2021 Sep 15. J Emerg Med. 2021. PMID: 34535304 Review.
-
San Francisco Syncope Rule to predict short-term serious outcomes: a systematic review.CMAJ. 2011 Oct 18;183(15):E1116-26. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.101326. Epub 2011 Sep 26. CMAJ. 2011. PMID: 21948723 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Interhospital variability in hospital admissions for patients with low-risk syncope presenting to the emergency department.Heart Rhythm O2. 2024 Jun 18;5(7):435-442. doi: 10.1016/j.hroo.2024.06.006. eCollection 2024 Jul. Heart Rhythm O2. 2024. PMID: 39119025 Free PMC article.
-
Utility of serial troponin testing for emergency department patients with syncope.CJEM. 2024 Aug;26(8):535-542. doi: 10.1007/s43678-024-00740-1. Epub 2024 Aug 2. CJEM. 2024. PMID: 39095575
-
Syncope in the Emergency Department: A Practical Approach.J Clin Med. 2024 May 30;13(11):3231. doi: 10.3390/jcm13113231. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 38892942 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Development and Validation of a Novel Predictive Model for the Early Differentiation of Cardiac and Non-Cardiac Syncope.Int J Gen Med. 2024 Mar 6;17:841-853. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S454521. eCollection 2024. Int J Gen Med. 2024. PMID: 38463438 Free PMC article.
-
A Hybrid Model for 30-Day Syncope Prognosis Prediction in the Emergency Department.J Pers Med. 2023 Dec 20;14(1):4. doi: 10.3390/jpm14010004. J Pers Med. 2023. PMID: 38276219 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Sun BC, Thiruganasambandamoorthy V, Cruz JD; Consortium to Standardize ED Syncope Risk Stratification Reporting . Standardized reporting guidelines for emergency department syncope risk-stratification research. Acad Emerg Med. 2012;19(6):694-702. doi:10.1111/j.1553-2712.2012.01375.x - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
