Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Mar 25;16(3):e1008707.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1008707. eCollection 2020 Mar.

Pleiotropy facilitates local adaptation to distant optima in common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia)

Affiliations

Pleiotropy facilitates local adaptation to distant optima in common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia)

Tuomas Hämälä et al. PLoS Genet. .

Abstract

Pleiotropy, the control of multiple phenotypes by a single locus, is expected to slow the rate of adaptation by increasing the chance that beneficial alleles also have deleterious effects. However, a prediction arising from classical theory of quantitative trait evolution states that pleiotropic alleles may have a selective advantage when phenotypes are distant from their selective optima. We examine the role of pleiotropy in regulating adaptive differentiation among populations of common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia); a species that has recently expanded its North American range due to human-mediated habitat change. We employ a phenotype-free approach by using connectivity in gene networks as a proxy for pleiotropy. First, we identify loci bearing footprints of local adaptation, and then use genotype-expression mapping and co-expression networks to infer the connectivity of the genes. Our results indicate that the putatively adaptive loci are highly pleiotropic, as they are more likely than expected to affect the expression of other genes, and they reside in central positions within the gene networks. We propose that the conditionally advantageous alleles at these loci avoid the cost of pleiotropy by having large phenotypic effects that are beneficial when populations are far from their selective optima. We further use evolutionary simulations to show that these patterns are in agreement with a model where populations face novel selective pressures, as expected during a range expansion. Overall, our results suggest that highly connected genes may be targets of positive selection during environmental change, even though they likely experience strong purifying selection in stable selective environments.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Population structure in A. artemisiifolia.
A: Map showing locations of the populations. Map tiles by Stamen Design, under CC BY 3.0. B: Genetic variation along the first two axes of a principal components analysis (PCA). Variation explained by the PCs is shown in brackets. C: The increase of genetic distance (FST) as a function of geographical distance between the populations. D: Estimated admixture proportions for three different numbers of ancestral populations (K).
Fig 2
Fig 2. Evidence of selective sweeps at candidate genes.
Fay and Wu’s H and CLR distributions of the selection outliers, eQTLs, and eGenes are compared against the rest of the transcriptome for two datasets. The horizontal lines mark the medians of the control genes.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Gene network topology at the candidate genes.
A: The percentage of eQTLs and eGenes found among the LFMM and PCAdapt outliers compared against all genes. Error bars show 95% bootstrap-based CIs. B: Connectivity measures at candidate genes. The horizontal line marks the median of the control genes.
Fig 4
Fig 4. Visual representation of two network modules containing more than expected LFMM and PCAdapt outliers.
Circles represent genes and lines show connections between them. Distance from the core signifies decreasing connectivity. Outliers, highlighted in color, are located in more central positions than expected by chance.
Fig 5
Fig 5. Simulated population fitness under different levels of pleiotropy, i.e. the number of phenotypes controlled by a single QTL (horizontal axis).
Phenotypes start from an initial value 0 and selection acts to move them towards three different optima. Shown are medians and interquartile ranges (IQR) from 300 simulation. The fitness estimates were normalized in relation to the non-pleiotropic class (median = 0, IQR = 1).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Fisher RA. The genetic theory of natural selection. Oxford: The Carendon Press; 1930.
    1. Orr HA. Adaptation and the cost of complexity. Evolution. 2000;54: 13–20. 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2000.tb00002.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Welch JJ, Waxman D. Modularity and the cost of complexity. Evolution. 2003;57: 1723–1734. 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb00581.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chevin LM, Martin G, Lenormand T. Fisher’s model and the genomics of adaptation: Restricted pleiotropy, heterogenous mutation, and parallel evolution. Evolution. 2010;64: 3213–3231. 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01058.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Martin G, Lenormand T. The fitness effect of mutations across environments: Fisher’s geometrical model with multiple optima. Evolution. 2015;69: 1433–1447. 10.1111/evo.12671 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

Grants and funding

This work was supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) grants IOS-1546863 to PT and DEB-1754026 to DAM, as well as by the following research fellowships awarded to AJG: Carol H. and Wayne Pletcher Fellowship, Ray C. Anderson Zoology and Genetics Fellowship, Alexander and Lydia Anderson Grant, Frank McKinney Fellowship (Bell Natural History Museum), and the EEB Graduate Program Research Grant. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NSF. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.