Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Sep:102:104-113.
doi: 10.1016/j.futures.2018.03.007. Epub 2018 Mar 13.

The challenge of framing for efforts to mitigate the risks of "dual use" research in the life sciences

Jo L Husbands  1
Affiliations

The challenge of framing for efforts to mitigate the risks of "dual use" research in the life sciences

Jo L Husbands. Futures. 2018 Sep.

Abstract

Drawing upon insights from research in the social sciences about the role of "issue framing" in policy debates, the paper presents an argument for employing "Responsible Science" as the fundamental frame for strategies to engage scientists and scientific organizations in issues related to the potential risks posed by "dual use" research in the life sciences. It argues that this focus on responsibilities rather than requirements will be more effective, particularly in initial engagement efforts. The work of several international scientific organizations to employ this framing in their education and outreach activities is presented to illustrate the advantages of such an approach. The paper also includes a case study of a controversy over dual use research with highly pathogenic avian influenza to illustrate the power of framing in policy debates.

Keywords: Biosecurity; Dual use research; Issue framing; Responsible conduct of science.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Spectrum of Biological Risks.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Biological Weapons Convention (BWC) Biological Weapons Convention; Geneva: 2006. Sixth review conference of the states parties to the biological and toxin weapons convention: Final document. BWC/CONF.VI/6.
    1. BWC . Biological Weapons Convention; Geneva: 2013. Report of the meeting of states parties. BWC/MSP/2013/5.
    1. BWC . Biological Weapons Convention.; Geneva: 2016. Eighth review conference of the states parties to the biological and toxin weapons convention: Final document. BWC/CONF.VIIII/4.
    1. BWC . Biological Weapons Convention; Geneva: 2017. Final report – advance version. 12 December 2017.
    1. Cambridge Working Group . 2014. Consensus statement. July 14. [Available at: http://www.cambridgeworkinggroup.org/ (Accessed 27 January 2018)]

LinkOut - more resources