Objective: To investigate the status quo of the diagnosis and treatment of male urethritis (MU) in urology and andrology.
Methods: According to The Guidelines for Clinical Diagnosis and Treatment of Sexually Transmitted Diseases (2017), we designed 27 questions on the prevalence, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of MU. Using these questions, we conducted a questionnaire investigation among urological, andrological and other relevant clinicians with different professional titles, followed by an analysis of the compliance of the doctors to the Guidelines.
Results: Totally, 116 valid questionnaires were collected from 86 urological, 28 andrological and 2 other relevant doctors, including 22 professors, 36 associate professors, 40 attending doctors and 16 resident doctors. MU was found mostly in those aged 20－40 years and more than half of the patients had a history of unclean sex, gonococcal urethritis significantly less prevalent than non-gonococcal, with Ureaplasma urealyticum as the most common pathogen of non-gonococcal urethritis. As for the compliance to the Guidelines in the diagnosis of MU, 22.73% of the professors, 16.67% of the associate professors, 15.00% of the attending doctors and 12.50% of the resident doctors examined the eyes, mouth and perianus (P > 0.05), 40.91% of the professors, 58.33% of the associate professors, 40.00% of the attending doctors and 37.50% of the resident doctors conducted HIV and syphilis screening (P > 0.05), and 86.36% of the professors, 77.78% of the associate professors, 70.00% of the attending doctors and 75.00% of the resident doctors performed genital mycoplasma screening (P > 0.05). Concerning the treatment of MU, 50.00% of the professors, 47.22% of the associate professors, 22.50% of the attending doctors and 43.75% of the resident doctors used anti-Chlamydia trachomatis drugs for gonococcal urethritis (P > 0.05), 0.00% of the professors, 11.11% of the associate professors, 5.00% of the attending doctors and 31.25% of the resident doctors prescribed 1g single-dose oral azithromycin for non-gonococcal urethritis (P < 0.05), 13.64% of the professors, 33.33% of the associate professors, 17.50% of the attending doctors and 6.25% of the resident doctors medicated persistent or recurrent non-gonococcal urethritis for >4 weeks (P > 0.05), 63.64% of the professors, 83.33% of the associate professors, 57.50% of the attending doctors and 62.50% of the resident doctors treated asymptomatic trachomatis and mycoplasma infections according to the proposed medication in the Guidelines (P > 0.05). As regards the results of treatment, the cure rate of gonococcal urethritis was 100.00% by professors, 97.22% by associate professors, 95.00% by attending doctors and 81.25% by resident doctors (P > 0.05), and that of non-gonococcal urethritis was 86.36% by professors, 61.11% by associate professors, 62.50% by attending doctors and 37.50% by resident doctors (P < 0.05).
Conclusions: Urological and andrological clinicians do not strictly follow the Guidelines in the diagnosis and treatment of male urethritis. There are significant differences in the dosing of azithromycin and results of treatment of non-gonococcal urethritis among doctors with different professional titles, but not in the other aspects.
Keywords: Mycoplasma genitalium; clinicians; non-gonococcal urethritis; questionnaire; gonococcal urethritis.