Posteroanterior Lag Screws Versus Posterior Buttress Plate Fixation of Posterior Malleolar Fragments in Spiral Tibial Shaft Fracture

Abstract

The aim of this study is to compare the clinical outcomes of posteroanterior (PA) lag screws versus posterior buttress plate fixation in treatment of posterior malleolar fragments (PMFs) in spiral tibial shaft fracture, and provide guidance for surgeons selecting a treatment strategy. A total of 48 eligible patients with PMFs associated with spiral tibial shaft fracture surgically treated from March 2009 to January 2016 were included in the study. They were divided into the screw group (n = 24) and the plate group (n = 24). All operations were performed via a posterolateral approach by a senior orthopedic surgeon. The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, visual analog scale (VAS), and assessment of ankle range of motion (ROM) were used for clinical evaluation. The radiographic evaluation of posttraumatic arthritis scale was determined by Bargon reference criteria. At the mean follow-up period of 29.5 ± 4.3 and 30.4 ± 4.1 months, respectively (p > .05), all patients in both groups had bone union without severe wound problems or complications. There were no significant differences in AOFAS (92.5 ± 5.3 vs 94.7 ± 5.6, p = .129) and VAS (2.4 ± 0.8 vs 2.2 ± 0.9, p = .196) scores between the groups at final follow-up. No significant differences were found between the groups in injured/contralateral ankle ROM or posttraumatic ankle arthritis scale postoperatively (p > .05). For PMFs in spiral tibial shaft fracture, PA lag screws or posterior buttress plate fixation via a posterolateral approach can achieve good and equivalent clinical and radiological outcomes with minimal complications.

Keywords: posterior malleolar fragments; posteroanterior lag screws; posterolateral approach; spiral tibial shaft fracture.