Early gastric cancer detection in high-risk patients: a multicentre randomised controlled trial on the effect of second-generation narrow band imaging
- PMID: 32241898
- PMCID: PMC7788198
- DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-319631
Early gastric cancer detection in high-risk patients: a multicentre randomised controlled trial on the effect of second-generation narrow band imaging
Abstract
Objective: Early detection of gastric cancer has been the topic of major efforts in high prevalence areas. Whether advanced imaging methods, such as second-generation narrow band imaging (2G-NBI) can improve early detection, is unknown.
Design: This open-label, randomised, controlled tandem trial was conducted in 13 hospitals. Patients at increased risk for gastric cancer were randomly assigned to primary white light imaging (WLI) followed by secondary 2G-NBI (WLI group: n=2258) and primary 2G-NBI followed by secondary WLI (2G-NBI group: n=2265) performed by the same examiner. Suspected early gastric cancer (EGC) lesions in both groups were biopsied. Primary endpoint was the rate of EGC patients in the primary examination. The main secondary endpoint was the positive predictive value (PPV) for EGC in suspicious lesions detected (primary examination).
Results: EGCs were found in 44 (1.9%) and 53 (2.3%; p=0.412) patients in the WLI and 2G-NBI groups, respectively, during primary EGD. In a post hoc analysis, the overall rate of lesions detected at the second examination was 25% (n=36/145), with no significant differences between groups. PPV for EGC in suspicious lesions was 13.5% and 20.9% in the WLI (50/371 target lesions) and 2G-NBI groups (59/282 target lesions), respectively (p=0.015).
Conclusion: The overall sensitivity of primary endoscopy for the detection of EGC in high-risk patients was only 75% and should be improved. 2G-NBI did not increase EGC detection rate over conventional WLI. The impact of a slightly better PPV of 2G-NBI has to be evaluated further.
Trial registration number: UMIN000014503.
Keywords: endoscopy; gastric cancer; screening; surveillance.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: MM received grants from Olympus during the study period. TY received personal fees and non-financial support from Olympus, outside this study.
Figures
Comment in
-
Incorrectly analysing stratified and minimised trials may lead to wrongfully rejecting superiority of interventions.Gut. 2022 May;71(5):1038-1039. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2021-324936. Epub 2021 Jul 14. Gut. 2022. PMID: 34261753 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Near-focus magnification and second-generation narrow-band imaging for early gastric cancer in a randomized trial.J Gastroenterol. 2020 Dec;55(12):1127-1137. doi: 10.1007/s00535-020-01734-3. Epub 2020 Oct 6. J Gastroenterol. 2020. PMID: 33021688 Clinical Trial.
-
[Clinical Value of White Light Image, Endoscopic Ultrasonography and Magnifying Endoscopy with Narrow Band Imaging in Evaluation of Indications for Endoscopic Treatment of Early Gastric Cancer].Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2022 Jan;53(1):154-159. doi: 10.12182/20220160107. Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2022. PMID: 35048617 Free PMC article. Chinese.
-
Magnifying narrow-band imaging endoscopy is superior in diagnosis of early gastric cancer.World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Aug 14;21(30):9156-62. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i30.9156. World J Gastroenterol. 2015. PMID: 26290643 Free PMC article.
-
Diagnostic performance of magnifying narrow-band imaging for early gastric cancer: A meta-analysis.World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Jul 7;21(25):7884-94. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i25.7884. World J Gastroenterol. 2015. PMID: 26167089 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Advanced endoscopic imaging for early gastric cancer.Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2015 Aug;29(4):575-87. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2015.05.010. Epub 2015 Jun 9. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2015. PMID: 26381303 Review.
Cited by
-
BEST-J Score: Validation of a Predicting Model for Delayed Bleeding After Gastric Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection on a European Sample.Dig Dis Sci. 2024 Feb 14. doi: 10.1007/s10620-024-08293-0. Online ahead of print. Dig Dis Sci. 2024. PMID: 38353789
-
Oral microbiota disorder in GC patients revealed by 2b-RAD-M.J Transl Med. 2023 Nov 18;21(1):831. doi: 10.1186/s12967-023-04599-1. J Transl Med. 2023. PMID: 37980457 Free PMC article.
-
Texture and color enhancement imaging improves the visibility of gastric neoplasms: clinical trial with image catalogue assessment using conventional and newly developed endoscopes.BMC Gastroenterol. 2023 Nov 13;23(1):389. doi: 10.1186/s12876-023-03030-9. BMC Gastroenterol. 2023. PMID: 37957560 Free PMC article.
-
Survival of gastric cancer patients in Iran: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench. 2023;16(3):245-258. doi: 10.22037/ghfbb.v16i2.2674. Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench. 2023. PMID: 37767325 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Advanced Imaging in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: A Literature Review of the Current State of the Art.GE Port J Gastroenterol. 2022 Nov 4;30(3):175-191. doi: 10.1159/000527083. eCollection 2023 Jun. GE Port J Gastroenterol. 2022. PMID: 37387720 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Katai H, Ishikawa T, Akazawa K, et al. . Five-Year survival analysis of surgically resected gastric cancer cases in Japan: a retrospective analysis of more than 100,000 patients from the nationwide registry of the Japanese gastric cancer association (2001-2007). Gastric Cancer 2018;21:144–54. 10.1007/s10120-017-0716-7 - DOI - PubMed