Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Apr 3;20(1):82.
doi: 10.1186/s12890-020-1108-z.

Diagnostic Procedure for Idiopathic Eosinophilic Pleural Effusion: A Single-Center Experience

Affiliations
Free PMC article

Diagnostic Procedure for Idiopathic Eosinophilic Pleural Effusion: A Single-Center Experience

Weizhan Luo et al. BMC Pulm Med. .
Free PMC article

Abstract

Background: Eosinophilic pleural effusion (EPE) is attributed to several well-recognised causes. However, some patients remain idiopathic, even after thorough clinical work-up. The present study aimed to better characterize idiopathic EPE (IEPE) and to outline the diagnostic procedure for this disease.

Methods: Complete clinical data of 11 consecutive patients with IEPE were prospectively collected and analysed. Preliminary diagnostic procedure of IEPE in our hospital was performed.

Results: All the 11 patients had respiratory symptoms and unilateral pleural effusion (PE) occurred in 4 patients. The mean percentage of eosinophils in PE was 22.4% (range, 12.4-50.5%). Lactate dehydrogenase, adenosine deaminase, proteins and carcinoembryonic antigen in PE were 246.0 U/L (range, 89.8-421.9 U/L), 13.8 U/L (range, 1.8-24.0 U/L), 42.6 g/dl (range, 32.8-52.6 g/dl) and 2.17 mg/mL (range, 0.46-4.31 mg/mL), respectively. Parasite-specific IgG antibody in blood and parasite eggs in stool were both negative. No evidence of tuberculosis or malignancy was observed in pleural biopsy. Symptoms and abnormal pulmonary imaging were eliminated after glucocorticoid use.

Conclusions: IEPE is a diagnosis of exclusion. Patients with EPE without a clear cause should be asked to provided complete medical, surgical and drug-related histories. A thorough work-up is essential. Moreover, we recommend follow-up after the use of glucocorticoid until effusion resolves.

Trial registration: GYFYY. Registration No: GYFYY20150901221. Registered time: 1 September 2015. Date of enrolment of the first participant to the trial: 22 January 2016.

Keywords: Diagnosis; Diagnostic procedure; Eosinophilic pleural effusion; Glucocorticoid; Idiopathic.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
a 44-year-old male patient with IEPE (case 3). Chest CT a, b scans showed bilateral PE and consolidation in the lower right lung, pericardial effusion
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Follow-up chest CT scan of case 3. Total regression of PE, consolidation in the lower right lung and pericardial effusion with no recurrences
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Schematic diagram of diagnostic procedure of IEPE

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Mercer RM, Corcoran JP, Porcel JM, Rahman NM, Psallidas I. Interpreting pleural fluid results. Clin Med (Lond) 2019;19:213–217. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.19-3-213. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aboudara M, Maldonado F. Update in the Management of Pleural Effusions. Med Clin North Am. 2019;103:475–485. doi: 10.1016/j.mcna.2018.12.007. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Simó M, Pallisa E, Jaúregui A, Montoro B, Vázquez A, Bello I, Persiva O, Alemán C, Thoracic CT. Scan vs PET-TC imaging in the diagnosis of patients suffering exudative pleural effusions with suspicion of malignancy. Arch Bronconeumol. 2019;55:544–546. doi: 10.1016/j.arbres.2019.02.012. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Adelman M, Albelda SM, Gottlieb J, Haponik ED. Diagnostic utility of pleural fluid eosinophilia. Am J Med. 1984;77:915–920. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(84)90542-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kalomenidis I, Light RW. Eosinophilic pleural effusions. Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2003;9(4):254–260. doi: 10.1097/00063198-200307000-00002. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources

Feedback