ADVANCE in context: The benefits, risks and feasibility of providing intensive glycaemic control based on gliclazide modified release

Diabetes Obes Metab. 2020 Apr:22 Suppl 2:5-11. doi: 10.1111/dom.13968.

Abstract

In the last 3 decades, four large multicentre, randomized clinical trials of patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS, ADVANCE, ACCORD and VADT) have studied different approaches to achieving near normal glycaemic targets. Each was designed against a background of international and national guidelines recommending glycaemic targets of 6.5% or less to prevent diabetic complications. Collectively, these clinical trials provide the most robust evidence of the potential vascular benefits and risks of more versus less glucose control and provide critical insights into how therapies are used. In this review, the glucose-lowering approach used by the ADVANCE trial is considered and compared with those used by the other trials.

Keywords: antidiabetic drug; cardiovascular disease; diabetes complications; glycaemic control; sulphonylureas.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Blood Glucose
  • Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2* / drug therapy
  • Feasibility Studies
  • Gliclazide* / adverse effects
  • Glycemic Control
  • Humans
  • Hypoglycemic Agents / adverse effects
  • Multicenter Studies as Topic
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Substances

  • Blood Glucose
  • Hypoglycemic Agents
  • Gliclazide