Neural selectivity, efficiency, and dose equivalence in deep brain stimulation through pulse width tuning and segmented electrodes

Collin J Anderson; Daria Nesterovich Anderson; Stefan M Pulst; Christopher R Butson; Alan D Dorval

doi:10.1016/j.brs.2020.03.017

Neural selectivity, efficiency, and dose equivalence in deep brain stimulation through pulse width tuning and segmented electrodes

Brain Stimul. 2020 Jul-Aug;13(4):1040-1050. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2020.03.017. Epub 2020 Apr 9.

Authors

Collin J Anderson¹, Daria Nesterovich Anderson², Stefan M Pulst³, Christopher R Butson⁴, Alan D Dorval⁵

Affiliations

¹ University of Utah Department of Neurology, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. Electronic address: collina@genetics.utah.edu.
² University of Utah Department of Biomedical Engineering, Salt Lake City, UT, USA; University of Utah Department of Neurosurgery, Salt Lake City, UT, USA; University of Utah Scientific Computing and Imaging Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
³ University of Utah Department of Neurology, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
⁴ University of Utah Department of Neurology, Salt Lake City, UT, USA; University of Utah Department of Biomedical Engineering, Salt Lake City, UT, USA; University of Utah Department of Neurosurgery, Salt Lake City, UT, USA; University of Utah Scientific Computing and Imaging Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, USA; University of Utah Department of Psychiatry, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
⁵ University of Utah Department of Biomedical Engineering, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.

Abstract

Background: Achieving deep brain stimulation (DBS) dose equivalence is challenging, especially with pulse width tuning and directional contacts. Further, the precise effects of pulse width tuning are unknown, and recent reports of the effects of pulse width tuning on neural selectivity are at odds with classic biophysical studies.

Methods: We created multicompartment neuron models for two axon diameters and used finite element modeling to determine extracellular influence from standard and segmented electrodes. We analyzed axon activation profiles and calculated volumes of tissue activated.

Results: We find that long pulse widths focus the stimulation effect on small, nearby fibers, suppressing distant white matter tract activation (responsible for some DBS side effects) and improving battery utilization when equivalent activation is maintained for small axons. Directional leads enable similar benefits to a greater degree. Reexamining previous reports of short pulse stimulation reducing side effects, we explore a possible alternate explanation: non-dose equivalent stimulation may have resulted in reduced spread of neural activation. Finally, using internal capsule avoidance as an example in the context of subthalamic stimulation, we present a patient-specific model to show how long pulse widths could help increase the biophysical therapeutic window.

Discussion: We find agreement with classic studies and predict that long pulse widths may focus the stimulation effect on small, nearby fibers and improve power consumption. While future pre-clinical and clinical work is necessary regarding pulse width tuning, it is clear that future studies must ensure dose equivalence, noting that energy- and charge-equivalent amplitudes do not result in equivalent spread of neural activation when changing pulse width.

Keywords: Deep brain stimulation; Directional electrodes; Dose equivalence; Energy efficiency; Neuron modeling; Pulse width.

Publication types

Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

MeSH terms

Axons / physiology
Deep Brain Stimulation / instrumentation
Deep Brain Stimulation / methods*
Deep Brain Stimulation / standards
Electrodes / standards
Humans
Models, Neurological*
Patient-Specific Modeling

Abstract

Publication types

MeSH terms

Grants and funding