Making sense of blood glucose data and self-management in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A qualitative study
- PMID: 32279366
- DOI: 10.1111/jocn.15280
Making sense of blood glucose data and self-management in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A qualitative study
Abstract
Aims and objectives: To describe individuals' with type 2 diabetes mellitus sense-making of blood glucose data and other influences impacting self-management behaviour.
Background: Type 2 diabetes mellitus prevalence is increasing globally. Adherence to effective diabetes self-management regimens is an ongoing healthcare challenge. Examining individuals' sense-making processes can advance staff knowledge of and improve diabetes self-management behaviour.
Design: A qualitative exploratory design examining how individuals make sense of blood glucose data and symptoms, and the influence on self-management decisions.
Methods: Sixteen one-on-one interviews with adults diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus using a semi-structured interview guide were conducted from March-May 2018. An inductive-deductive thematic analysis of data using the Sensemaking Framework for Chronic Disease Self-Management was used. The consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ) checklist were used in completing this paper.
Results: Three main themes described participants' type 2 diabetes mellitus sense-making and influences on self-management decisions: classifying blood glucose data, building mental models and making self-management decisions. Participants classified glucose levels based on prior personal experiences. Participants learned about diabetes from classes, personal experience, health information technology and their social network. Seven participants expressed a need for periodic refreshing of diabetes knowledge.
Conclusion: Individuals use self-monitored glucose values and/or HbA1C values to evaluate glucose control. When using glucose values, they analyse the context in which the value was obtained through the lens of personal parameters and expectations. Understanding how individuals make sense of glycaemic data and influences on diabetes self-management behaviour with periodic reassessment of this understanding can guide the healthcare team in optimising collaborative individualised care plans.
Relevance to clinical practice: Nurses must assess sense-making processes in self-management decisions. Periodic "refresher" diabetes education may be needed for individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Keywords: adult nursing; decision-making; diabetes; patients’ experience; qualitative study; self-management.
© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Similar articles
-
Enhanced self-monitoring blood glucose in non-insulin-requiring Type 2 diabetes: A qualitative study in primary care.J Clin Nurs. 2018 May;27(9-10):2120-2131. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14369. J Clin Nurs. 2018. PMID: 29603813
-
Continuous glucose monitoring in adults with type 1 diabetes: A balance between benefits and barriers: A critical incident study.J Clin Nurs. 2019 Sep;28(17-18):3318-3329. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14911. Epub 2019 Jun 6. J Clin Nurs. 2019. PMID: 31090960
-
Educational diagnosis of self-management behaviours in patients with diabetes mellitus, hypertension and hypercholesterolaemia based on the PRECEDE model: Qualitative study.J Clin Nurs. 2019 May;28(9-10):1745-1759. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14794. Epub 2019 Feb 6. J Clin Nurs. 2019. PMID: 30667574
-
The impact of telemedicine on patient self-management processes and clinical outcomes for patients with Types I or II Diabetes Mellitus in the United States: A scoping review.Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2019 Mar-Apr;13(2):1353-1357. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2019.02.014. Epub 2019 Feb 11. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2019. PMID: 31336491 Review.
-
FreeStyle Libre Flash Glucose Self-Monitoring System: A Single-Technology Assessment [Internet].Oslo, Norway: Knowledge Centre for the Health Services at The Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NIPH); 2017 Aug 21. Report from the Norwegian Institute of Public Health No. 2017-07. Oslo, Norway: Knowledge Centre for the Health Services at The Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NIPH); 2017 Aug 21. Report from the Norwegian Institute of Public Health No. 2017-07. PMID: 29553668 Free Books & Documents. Review.
Cited by
-
Delineating and clarifying the concept of self-care monitoring: a concept analysis.Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2023 Dec;18(1):2241231. doi: 10.1080/17482631.2023.2241231. Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2023. PMID: 37506372 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The Combination of Sensor Digital Kariasa Early Detection Prototype and Health Education for Self-Management in Preventing Recurrent Ischemic Stroke.SAGE Open Nurs. 2022 Dec 6;8:23779608221143906. doi: 10.1177/23779608221143906. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec. SAGE Open Nurs. 2022. PMID: 36505094 Free PMC article.
-
Patient Perspectives on Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose When not Using Insulin: a Cross-sectional Survey.J Gen Intern Med. 2022 May;37(7):1673-1679. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-07047-2. Epub 2021 Aug 13. J Gen Intern Med. 2022. PMID: 34389935 Free PMC article.
-
Lived experience of having type 2 diabetes: A phenomenological research in three villages in rural Northern Saudi Arabia.J Family Med Prim Care. 2021 Jan;10(1):149-153. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1421_20. Epub 2021 Jan 30. J Family Med Prim Care. 2021. PMID: 34017718 Free PMC article.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Adeniyi, A. F., Anjana, R. M., & Weber, M. B. (2016). Global account of barriers and facilitators of physical activity among patients with diabetes mellitus: A narrative review of the literature. Current Diabetes Reviews, 12(4), 440-448. https://doi.org/10.2174/1573399812666160609102956
-
- American Association of Diabetes Educators (2014). AADE7TM Self-Care Behaviors: American Association of Diabetes Educators (AADE) Position Statement [Position Paper]. Retrieved from American Association of Diabetes Educators website https://www.diabeteseducator.org/docs/default-source/legacy-docs/_resour...
-
- American Diabetes Association (2018a). 2. Classification and diagnosis of diabetes: Standards of medical care in diabetes-2018. Diabetes Care, 41(Suppl. 1), S13-S27. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc18-S002
-
- American Diabetes Association (2018b). 6. Glycemic targets: Standards of medical care in diabetes-2018. Diabetes Care, 41(Suppl. 1), S55-S64. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc18-S006
-
- American Diabetes Association (2018c). Economic costs of diabetes in the U.S. in 2017. Diabetes Care, 41(5), 917-928. https://doi.org/10.2337/dci18-0007
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
