Three-dimensional culture systems that allow generation of monolayered epithelial cell spheroids are widely used to study epithelial function in vitro. Epithelial spheroid formation is applied to address cellular consequences of (mono)-genetic disorders, that is, ciliopathies, in toxicity testing, or to develop treatment options aimed to restore proper epithelial cell characteristics and function. With the potential of a high-throughput method, the main obstacle to efficient application of the spheroid formation assay so far is the laborious, time-consuming, and bias-prone analysis of spheroid images by individuals. Hundredths of multidimensional fluorescence images are blinded, rated by three persons, and subsequently, differences in ratings are compared and discussed. Here, we apply supervised learning and compare strategies based on machine learning versus deep learning. While deep learning approaches can directly process raw image data, machine learning requires transformed data of features extracted from fluorescence images. We verify the accuracy of both strategies on a validation data set, analyse an experimental data set, and observe that different strategies can be very accurate. Deep learning, however, is less sensitive to overfitting and experimental batch-to-batch variations, thus providing a rather powerful and easily adjustable classification tool.
Keywords: 3D culture; CNN; deep learning; epithelial morphogenesis; image analysis; machine learning; polarity; spheroids.
Copyright © 2020 Soetje, Fuellekrug, Haffner and Ziegler.