Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jun;12(3):990-996.
doi: 10.1111/os.12660. Epub 2020 Apr 15.

Identification of Novel EXT Mutations in Patients with Hereditary Multiple Exostoses Using Whole-Exome Sequencing

Affiliations

Identification of Novel EXT Mutations in Patients with Hereditary Multiple Exostoses Using Whole-Exome Sequencing

Chao Liang et al. Orthop Surg. 2020 Jun.

Abstract

Objective: To find novel potential gene mutations other than EXT1 and EXT2 mutations, to expand the mutational spectrum of EXT and to explore the correlation between clinical outcome and genotype in patients with hereditary multiple exostoses (HME).

Methods: The study recruited seven families diagnosed with multiple osteochondromas (MO). Family histories and clinical information were collected in detail through comprehensive physical and image examination. Patients with deformities and functional limitations were classified as "severe" and the remaining without functional limitations were classified as "mild," in accordance with previous study. Whole-exome sequencing (WES) was performed on a total of 13 affected individuals, 1 available unaffected relative, and 10 healthy unrelated individuals. Sanger sequencing was used to validate the screened mutations. Finally, the structural change in protein caused by pathogenic mutations was analyzed using information from the relevant database online and we attempted to correlate clinical phenotype with genotype in patients with HME.

Results: Other than EXT1 and EXT2, no novel potential gene mutations were found through WES. We identified nine heterozygous mutations in EXT1 or EXT2. Of these mutations, four have not been reported previously. These are c.996delT in exon 2 of EXT1 (family 1), c.544C > T in exon 3 of EXT2 (family 2), c.1171C > T in exon 7 of EXT2 (family 5), and c.823- 824delAA in exon 5 of EXT1 (family 7). The other five mutations have already been reported in previous works. It was surprising that we found two mutation sites, in exon 2 and exon 5, respectively, of EXT1 in 1 patient diagnosed with MO, when his father had two mutation sites, in exon 6 and exon 5, respectively, of EXT1 and EXT2 (family 4). In addition, 1 patient showed degeneration, while his father only exhibited slight symptoms (family 7). In our study, among 51 affected patients in seven families, the sex ratio (male vs female) was 58.9% (n = 30) vs 41.2% (n = 21). Male patients seemed to show more severe symptoms compared to females, but because the sample was small, we did not obtain statistically significance results.

Conclusion: Whole-exome sequencing to screen pathogenic gene mutations was applied successfully. Although no third-gene mutation associated with HME was found, a total of nine mutations across EXT1 and EXT2 were identified, four of which are novel. Our results expand the mutational spectrum of EXT and can be used in genetic counseling and prenatal diagnosis for patients with MO.

Keywords: Bone tumor; EXT1; EXT2; Hereditary multiple exostoses; Whole-exome sequencing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Pedigree of seven families with multiple osteochondroma (MO). Black symbols represent the affected individuals and open symbols represent unaffected individuals. Circles and squares represent females and males, respectively. Arrows identify the probands in each family.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Appearance and radiology of the probands. (A) F1: X‐rays shows multiple exostoses on bilateral distal femur; (B) F2: One obvious bony prominence on his right rib; (C) F3: A huge exostosis on the proximal femur affecting the activation of hip joint; (D–F) (F4–F6, respectively): The X‐ray plain film shows multiple exostoses near the knee requiring surgery; (G) F7: a cauliflower‐like exostosis on the top of the pelvis; (H) F7: The plain radiograph of the distal femur showed extensive osteolytic lesions and obvious calcifications with a soft‐tissue mass.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Mutation analysis. (A) a frameshift mutation, c.996delT in exon 2 of EXT1; (B) a nonsense mutation, c.544C > T in exon 3 in EXT2; (C) a nonsense mutation. c.2053C > T in exon 10 in EXT1; (D) a missense mutation, c.896G > A in exon 5 of EXT2, a point mutation, c.8C > T in exon 2 of EXT2, a deletion, c.1469delT, in exon 6 of EXT1; (E) a nonsense mutation, c.1171C > T in exon 7 of EXT2; (F) a nonsense mutation, c.514C > T in exon 2 of EXT2; (G) a frameshift mutation, c.823824delAA in exon 5 in EXT2.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Wicklund CL, Pauli RM, Johnston D, Hecht JT. Natural history study of hereditary multiple exostoses. Am J Med Genet, 1995, 55: 43–46. - PubMed
    1. D'Arienzo A, Andreani L, Sacchetti F, Colangeli S, Capanna R. Hereditary multiple exostoses: current insights. Orthop Res Rev, 2019, 11: 199–211. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mordenti M, Ferrari E, Pedrini E, et al Validation of a new multiple osteochondromas classification through Switching Neural Networks. Am J Med Genet A, 2013, 161: 556–560. - PubMed
    1. Pedrini E, Jennes I, Tremosini M, et al Genotype‐phenotype correlation study in 529 patients with multiple hereditary exostoses: identification of “protective” and “risk” factors. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2011, 93: 2294–2302. - PubMed
    1. Vermeesch JR, Voet T, Devriendt K. Prenatal and pre‐implantation genetic diagnosis. Nat Rev Genet, 2016, 17: 643–656. - PubMed