Identifying a commercially-available 3D printing process that minimizes model distortion after annealing and autoclaving and the effect of steam sterilization on mechanical strength

Joshua V Chen; Kara S Tanaka; Alan B C Dang; Alexis Dang

doi:10.1186/s41205-020-00062-9

Identifying a commercially-available 3D printing process that minimizes model distortion after annealing and autoclaving and the effect of steam sterilization on mechanical strength

3D Print Med. 2020 Apr 15;6(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s41205-020-00062-9.

Authors

Joshua V Chen¹, Kara S Tanaka², Alan B C Dang^{2

3}, Alexis Dang^{2

3}

Affiliations

¹ Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA. Joshua.chen2@ucsf.edu.
² Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
³ Department of Surgery, Orthopaedic Section, San Francisco VA Health Care System, San Francisco, CA, USA.

Abstract

Background: Fused deposition modeling 3D printing is used in medicine for diverse purposes such as creating patient-specific anatomical models and surgical instruments. For use in the sterile surgical field, it is necessary to understand the mechanical behavior of these prints across 3D printing materials and after autoclaving. It has been previously understood that steam sterilization weakens polylactic acid, however, annealing heat treatment of polylactic acid increases its crystallinity and mechanical strength. We aim to identify an optimal and commercially available 3D printing process that minimizes distortion after annealing and autoclaving and to quantify mechanical strength after these interventions.

Methods: Thirty millimeters cubes with four different infill geometries were 3D printed and subjected to hot water-bath annealing then immediate autoclaving. Seven commercially available 3D printing materials were tested to understand their mechanical behavior after intervention. The dimensions in the X, Y, and Z axes were measured before and after annealing, and again after subsequent autoclaving. Standard and strength-optimized Army-Navy retractor designs were printed using the 3D printing material and infill geometry that deformed the least. These retractors were subjected to annealing and autoclaving interventions and tested for differences in mechanical strength.

Results: For both the annealing and subsequent autoclaving intervention, the material and infill geometry that deformed the least, respectively, was Essentium PLA Gray and "grid". Standard retractors without intervention failed at 95 N +/- 2.4 N. Annealed retractors failed at 127.3 N +/- 10 N. Autoclave only retractors failed at 15.7 N +/- 1.4 N. Annealed then autoclaved retractors failed at 19.8 N +/- 3.1 N. Strength-optimized retractors, after the annealing then autoclaving intervention, failed at 164.8 N +/- 12.5 N.

Conclusion: For 30 mm cubes, the 3D printing material and infill geometry that deformed the least, respectively, was Essentium PLA and "grid". Hot water-bath annealing results in increased 3D printed model strength, however autoclaving 3D prints markedly diminishes strength. Strength-optimized 3D printed PLA Army-Navy retractors overcome the strength limitation due to autoclaving.

Keywords: 3D printing; 3D printing materials; Additive manufacturing; Annealing; Autoclave; Medical devices; Optimization; Polylactic acid; Sterilization; Surgical instruments.