Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2020 Apr 16;10(1):6483.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-63541-3.

Longterm outcome of anal fistula - A retrospective study

Affiliations
Free PMC article
Observational Study

Longterm outcome of anal fistula - A retrospective study

Christos Andreou et al. Sci Rep. .
Free PMC article

Abstract

This retrospective observational study analyses the outcomes of patients undergoing surgery for anal fistula at a single centre in order to assess recurrence and re-operation rates after different surgical techniques. During January 2005 and May 2013, all patients with anal fistula were included. Baseline characteristics, details of presentation, fistula anatomy, type of surgery, post-surgical outcomes and follow-up data were collected. The primary endpoints were long-term closure rate and recurrence rate after 2 years. Secondary endpoints were persistent pain, postoperative complications and continence status. A total of 65 patients were included. From a total amount of 93 operations, 65 were fistulotomies, 13 mucosal advancement flaps, 7 anal fistula plugs and 8 cutting-setons. The mean follow up was 80 months. Healing was achieved in 85%. The highest recurrence rate was seen in anal fistula plug with 42%. On the other hand, no recurrence was observed in the cutting-seton procedures. For all included operation no persistent postoperative pain nor incontinence was observed. In conclusion, despite all existing anal fistula operations up to date, the optimal technique with low recurrence rate and assured safety for the anal sphincter is still lacking. Nonetheless, according to our promising results for the cutting-seton technique, this technique, otherwise considered obsolete, should be further evaluated in a prospective study.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sahnan K, et al. Natural history of anorectal sepsis. Br. J. Surg. 2017;104:1857–1865. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10614. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Parks, A. G., Gordon, P. H. & Hardcastle, J. D. A classification of fistula‐in‐ano. Br. J. Surg., 10.1002/bjs.1800630102 (1976). - PubMed
    1. Belmonte Montes C, Ruiz Galindo GH, Montes Villalobos JL, Decanini Teran C. [Fistulotomy vs fistulectomy. Ultrasonographic evaluation of lesion of the anal sphincter function]. Rev. Gastroenterol. Mex. 1999;64:167–170. - PubMed
    1. Ratto, C., Litta, F., Donisi, L. & Parello, A. Fistulotomy or fistulectomy and primary sphincteroplasty for anal fistula (FIPS): a systematic review. Techniques in Coloproctology, 10.1007/s10151-015-1323-4 (2015). - PubMed
    1. Anandan H. A comparative study between fistulotomy and fistulectomy in management of low anal fistulae. Int. Surg. J. Ganesan R. 2017;4:3665–3669. doi: 10.18203/2349-2902.isj20174882. - DOI

Publication types