Cost-effectiveness of sequential urate lowering therapies for the management of gout in Singapore

J Med Econ. 2020 Aug;23(8):838-847. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2020.1757456. Epub 2020 May 13.

Abstract

Aims: Allopurinol is the most common urate lowering therapy (ULT) used to treat gout but may cause life-threatening severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCAR) in a small number of patients. Risk of SCAR is increased for patients with the HLA-B*58:01 genotype. When alternative ULT is required, febuxostat or probenecid are recommended. The aim of this study was to conduct a cost-utility analysis of sequential ULT treatment strategies for gout, including strategies with and without HLA-B*58:01 genotyping prior to treatment initiation, with a view to inform optimal gout management in Singapore.Materials and methods: A Markov model was developed from the Singapore healthcare payer perspective. Reflecting local practice, 12 different treatment strategies containing at least one ULT (allopurinol, febuxostat, probenecid) were evaluated in adults with gout. Response rates (SUA < 6mg/dL) were derived from an in-house network meta-analysis and from published literature. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated over a 30-year time horizon, with costs and benefits discounted at 3% per annum. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to explore uncertainties.Results: Sequential treatment of allopurinol 300 mg/day-allopurinol 600 mg/day-probenecid ("standard of care") was cost-effective compared to no ULT, with an ICER of SGD1,584/QALY. Allopurinol300-allopurinol600-probenecid-febuxostat sequence compared to allopurinol300-allopurinol600-probenecid had an ICER of SGD11,400/QALY. All other treatment strategies were dominated by preceding strategies. Treatment strategies incorporating HLA-B*58:01 genotyping before ULT use were dominated by the corresponding non-genotyping strategy.Conclusions: Current standard of care (allopurinol300-allopurinol 600-probenecid) for gout is cost-effective compared with no ULT in the local context. Febuxostat is unlikely to be cost-effective in Singapore at current prices unless it is used last-line.

Keywords: Allopurinol; I10; I18; cost-effectiveness; febuxostat; gout; quality-adjusted life years.

MeSH terms

  • Allopurinol / economics
  • Allopurinol / therapeutic use
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Febuxostat / economics
  • Febuxostat / therapeutic use
  • Genotype
  • Gout / drug therapy*
  • Gout / ethnology
  • Gout / genetics*
  • Gout Suppressants / administration & dosage
  • Gout Suppressants / adverse effects
  • Gout Suppressants / economics*
  • Gout Suppressants / therapeutic use*
  • HLA-B Antigens / genetics*
  • Humans
  • Kidney Function Tests
  • Markov Chains
  • Models, Econometric
  • Models, Statistical
  • Probenecid / economics
  • Probenecid / therapeutic use
  • Quality-Adjusted Life Years
  • Singapore
  • Uric Acid / blood

Substances

  • Gout Suppressants
  • HLA-B Antigens
  • Febuxostat
  • Uric Acid
  • Allopurinol
  • Probenecid